Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedMonqey

Your posts get weirder, longer, and further afield, I have answered you, I would much rather face a judge for pinching an arm or playing in a voluntary dodge ball game than for attacking someone violently, subduing them with pals, and cutting his hair off, meaning I think your questions in that regard are ridiculous.

Mitt was 17, old enough to enlist, although no male in his direct line has ever done so, even the draft can’t catch them.

You are smoking pot if you think that an attack of this nature was not a serious thing in 1965, I don’t know if you were still in high school yourself, or already out, but if you have some vision that such a thing was laughed off as an innocent prank, then you are wrong. My guess is that the victim kid kept it as quiet as possible.

Romney apologized for it, and claimed that he can’t remember it, a normal person would be stunned and outraged that it could even be thought possible for them to have been like that, they would not claim being unable to remember if they were doing that kind of thing or not. No one forgets doing that kind of violence.

When were your high school days?


135 posted on 05/11/2012 10:20:04 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Not voting Romney?? Then double up on down ticket races and your participation this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
You keep misquoting my statements and saying things I didn't say and you claim to say things you clearly didn't say.(Oh please, point out where you said "face a judge" !!)

I never said it wasn't "serious" but said it didn't warrant "criminal charges."That "the school would handle it"

No one else involved at the time deemed it criminal. Only Romney's accuser who wasn't there claims recently it was an "assault." And not until Romney appears to be the party's nominee,

Rather conveniently as the 'victim' couldn't give his version because he is dead.

On another thread you claimed:

"....with the question of how, or why no Romney man has ever served the United States as a military man, that is about 180 years of unbroken cult devotion that needs to be looked at."

When that was proven false by Brown Deer, you changed your story to "no direct lineage"

Of course that fact that the Romneys had family members serve in various armed forces and the fact his "direct lineage" was either too old or too young to serve during wartime put a large hole in you arguement about the Romneys didn't serve in the military.

I would say your claims are weird to the point of absurdity.

I give you further answers when you learn to read and comprehend these simple replies.
136 posted on 05/11/2012 11:59:44 PM PDT by RedMonqey (Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governance of lesser men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson