This is interesting because it means you are a criminal if you are doing something legal, but with the wrong intent. This might be like saying that buying fertilizer is a crime if the intent is to make a bomb (which, obviously, it's the making of the bomb itself that is more properly considered the illegal act).
I also find myself wondering if they were "planning a race war" or "planning for a race war", which are two entirely different things. The article seems to be deliberately vague on that.
Some of the so-called “charges” are real howlers. The rankest are keeping two pit bulls to guard their leader’ s property and having it fenced with bsrbrd wire. My, my two dogs for protection, a barbed wire fence and owning guns. How many ordinary citizens do the same things and similar things. These muts are a definite disgrace to the white race, just not as much as Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman’s attempted murderer was to the black race, but simply being walking crimes against nature doesn’t make them criminals.