To: philman_36; MamaTexan
...The law is "applicable upon" the children, it "applies to" the parents.
As HoneysuckleTN @intimated the other day I may not be expressing it correctly.
Oh, no, I never meant to suggest that you were not expressing it correctly. (I don't know enough about constitutional law or legalese to do that!) I only meant to offer alternate wording for clarification. I failed. MamaTexan's rephrasing at
#367 works much better than mine.
Thank you, MamaTexan.
381 posted on
05/09/2012 12:54:23 PM PDT by
HoneysuckleTN
(Where the woodbine twineth... || FUBO! OMG! ABO!)
To: HoneysuckleTN
I only meant to offer alternate wording for clarification. I failed. LOL! They were both fine, but you're welcome.
384 posted on
05/09/2012 1:33:56 PM PDT by
MamaTexan
(I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
To: HoneysuckleTN
I only meant to offer alternate wording for clarification. I failed.IMO you didn't fail at all. I was just trying to get
more info/commentary, not less.
MamaTexan's rephrasing at #367 works much better than mine.
I would agree. That doesn't make your suggested usage any less "applicable". {;^)
Some people may not understand no matter what is used.
389 posted on
05/09/2012 2:36:09 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson