Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
So Vattel doesn't hold his principles as being above all law and existing outside time and space - he considers them subject to civil and political laws that may ordain otherwise.

His principle would be that McCain would be an indigenous native citizen - and thus natural born - because of his soldier father serving overseas.

The English principle would be that McCain would be natural born because of his citizen father.

The American principle would be that McCain would be a citizen at birth and thus a natural born citizen not a naturalized citizen.

So WHERE and by WHO is natural born citizen defined such that McCain wouldn't be eligible?

358 posted on 05/09/2012 8:52:18 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
His principle would be that McCain would be an indigenous native citizen - and thus natural born - because of his soldier father serving overseas.
You just close your eyes completely to 215, don't you.

Once again...What was the law when McCain was born?

I've even given you the link to find out at @reply 343.

Here it is again for your convenience...@Immigration Act of 1924

Be sure to read Sec. 4. and Sec. 4. (c) carefully.

359 posted on 05/09/2012 9:01:58 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson