Replies

Where in U.S. law? 1401
Which is part of the laws governing naturalization (USC 8, also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA))

And as you well know positive law, those laws written by men, cannot make someone a natural born citizen.

Because he was born with natural allegiance to these United States, under the principles recognized in natural law, and thus he was a U.S. citizen at birth.
The principles of natural law require that he have citizen parents, which he had, and be born "in country". He wasn't born on a military installation, he was born in a civilian hospital in Panama.
@The Coco Solo Naval Hospital wasn't built until after 1941. (EO authorizing it to be built) He doesn't meet the requirements.

Now under what definition of “natural born” would McCain not qualify?
See above.

What principle of natural law as defined WHERE and by WHO requires that a child be born of citizen parents AND in country to be “natural born”?

Natural law as seen and expounded upon by Vattel would qualify McCain as he would be “deemed” to be born in country because his father was overseas serving his nation not “quitting” it.

Natural law as seen and written by England would qualify McCain as he was the child of a citizen father.

Natural law as seen and written by America would qualify McCain as he was a natural born citizen not a naturalized citizen.

So....What principle of natural law as defined WHERE and by WHO requires that a child be born of citizen parents AND in country to be “natural born”?