[Bigun]

To refuse to vote for the “lesser of two evils” puts one in the position of support for the greater of the same two evils by the simple act of not standing in the way of the greater evil’s eventually triumph.

From Realville

[JRandomFreeper]

False logic. My vote will not put a tally count in either Obama's or Romney's column. I will not vote for evil.

And pro-abortion, big-government, anti-gun Romney is evil.

No sale.

/johnny

[EternalVigilance]

New tagline ...

[American Dream 246]

4 years ago we reacted the same way. Never again. And we did it again. Same same old...so why would you think we will be different in 4 years? We keep on accepting the GOP choices and we keep on voting for "it" for the same reason - we have to defeat the evil in the White House.

That's where nothing will ever change because they know we always obey at the end.

They knocked down Sarah, Newt etc..and we did not fight for them enough anyway to keep them standing. And now we have romney, like we had mccain.

Why should I believe it will be different in 4 years? The only way to save the country is to send the GOP the way of the whigs and build a new party with Sarah at the wheel and as much in Congress as possible from the same party. That way the GOP will not be able to get rid of us each time.

[reaganaut]

To refuse to vote for the “lesser of two evils” puts one in the position of support for the greater of the same two evils by the simple act of not standing in the way of the greater evil’s eventually triumph.

- - - -
No to vote for the ‘lesser’ of two evils is still to vote for EVIL. I am standing in the way of evil triumphing on ANY level.

From Realville.

But go ahead, compromise, vote for evil and pat yourself on the back. You only have yourself to blame.

[TigersEye]

To refuse to vote for the “lesser of two evils” puts one in the position of support for the greater of the same two evils by the simple act of not standing in the way of the greater evil’s eventually triumph.

Bill 0'Reilly is famous for that kind of convoluted logic.

"Just because 0bama's policies are socialist doesn't mean he's a socialist." - Bill 0'Reilly

[Finny]

You want Realville?

Romney has a solidly documented record of being FOR all the things we conservatives are against -- state-run health care, abortion, activist judges, global warming regulation, and the gay agenda. Realville: you're willing to vote FOR that, to make that deal with the devil, in order to avoid Obama. In Realville, a deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition.