[Above My Pay Grade]

1) Breed “discrimination” makes sense because most breeds will NEVER or almost never kill or critically injure anyone. A few other breeds (including some you mentioned) do rarely cause such harm. Pit Bulls and to a lesser extent Rottweilers are responsible for the vast majority of dog bit fatalities. How many people were killed by Daschunds last year or in the last 30 years for that matter.

For the law to treat Pit Bulls the same as Beagles or Poodles would be as ridiculous as requiring the same training, licensing and insurance for a 4 year old riding a tricycle and a truck driver hauling hazardous materials.

2) All this ruling does is hold Pit Bull owners strictly liable for damage caused by their dogs. If your Pit Bull is a “good dog” and doesn’t harm anybody, this ruling will not affect you at all.

[tumblindice]

1) most breeds will NEVER or almost never kill or critically injure anyone.)
Begs the question. Absolute BS as well.

After reading the rest of your response, it’s just,
“No, I’m not. You are” nonsense and not worth a reply.

[who knows what evil?]

Want to move into base housing at Camp Pendleton with a pit bull or rottie?

Sorry. Those breeds aren't allowed. Wonder why?