[Antoninus]

FRiend, alarm bells should go off in your head when you advocate and promote re-electing Obama on here.

Hey, nothing would please me more than if Virgil Goode somehow started a grassroots brushfire and swept to victory in November over both Romney and Obama. (And actually, there is one politician who could potentially pull that off, in my opinion.) But I'm not so naive as to think that could happen short of divine intervention (and don't think I'm not praying for it.)

I'm dealing with realities here and frankly, all the realities stink on ice.

Let me ask you this. Setting aside party labels, if you had a choice of leaders between a lazy, ineffective, pampered marxist and a driven, efficient, amoral socialist with a vendetta against conservatives, which would you choose?

[llandres]

“if you had a choice of leaders between a lazy, ineffective, pampered marxist and a driven, efficient, amoral socialist with a vendetta against conservatives, which would you choose? “

a) BHO has NOT been ineffective - he’s been able to nearly destroy us, our alliances, the free practice/speech of any religion except Islam, and make us the laughing stock of the world (particularly to our enemies) in just three short years. But he’d finish these things with a horrific flourish, if re-elected.

b) BHO has a vendetta against America and her friends.

So, which would I choose? Any candidate running against The Wan.