Cain takes a very healthy attitude here toward defeating Obama, though I'm not entirely convinced that Romney would repeal Obamacare.
1 posted on
04/30/2012 10:08:52 AM PDT by
sthguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: sthguard
Definitely agree w this rundown. The worst that Romney is, is a liberal while Obama is a hardcore socialist and saboteur of jobs and industry.
49 posted on
04/30/2012 11:41:08 AM PDT by
dennisw
To: sthguard
For the first time since the primary campaigns started, I heart Herman Cain.
That was a great statement.
You go, Herman.
50 posted on
04/30/2012 11:41:34 AM PDT by
altura
(I retired my tag line--it is now receiving social security.)
To: All
As much as I've been on the "Not Voting For Romney, Rather Against obama" bandwagon, I have to say that the best the title of the article could read is "Nine horrendous Obama decisions Mitt Romney
PROBABLY would never have made" and still be intellectually honest.
Saying definitively that Romney wouldn't have made such decisions, given his track record, is wishful thinking, at best.
61 posted on
04/30/2012 12:21:44 PM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: All
As much as I've been on the "Not Voting For Romney, Rather Against obama" bandwagon, I have to say that the best the title of the article could read is "Nine horrendous Obama decisions Mitt Romney
PROBABLY would never have made" and still be intellectually honest.
Saying definitively that Romney wouldn't have made such decisions, given his track record, is wishful thinking, at best.
63 posted on
04/30/2012 12:22:04 PM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: sthguard
OMG! Now
Cain is the "Establishment!" Can we start attacking THIS good man now, too?!!??
And Reagan, when he supported GERALD FORD, was he the "Establishment"?...and now, anyone who prefers Romney to Obama is from the "Establishment!" or being "fooled" by them?!
No, we're not fooled. We know that a flawed Republican is better than a conniving Democrat.
To: sthguard
Oh no!
We must now add Herman to the GOPe column!
Along with Sarah Palin, Newt, and Dick Cheny!
68 posted on
04/30/2012 1:01:39 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(I'm with Sarah Palin and Dick Cheney - Anybody but Obama, because I trust their judgment.)
To: sthguard
It’s truly ironic since it was Romney and his super pacs which were behind the muckraking and destroying of Herman Cain, just as Mittens was behind the trashing of Palin earlier.
78 posted on
04/30/2012 2:24:08 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
To: sthguard
Cain makes some very good points. Now, if he only had a shred of evidence to back them up, I would take notice.
79 posted on
04/30/2012 2:27:02 PM PDT by
CharacterCounts
(A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
To: sthguard
Mitt Romney would not attack people for being successful. He would not encourage the middle class to resent successful people, but instead would encourage them to learn from those who have been successful, and to seek opportunities from them. So? Obama's going to keep doing that whether he's President or whether he's out of office on his multi-million dollar worldwide speaking tour or starting his own new talk show as the male Oprah.
81 posted on
04/30/2012 2:39:07 PM PDT by
JediJones
(From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
To: sthguard
Most of Cain’s arguments claim Romney won’t do the very same things Bush did...stimulus spending, new entitlement programs, deficits. It’s nice and all not to raise taxes, but not when you’re the “cut taxes and spend” party, the same attitude that started driving us into debt after Newt’s balanced budgets were abandoned. Besides, Romney “closed tax loopholes” and “raised fees” in Massachusetts, so he raised taxes any way he could as long as he could find a way not to call it “raising taxes.” Sorry, Herman, it’s just not plausible that Romney wouldn’t do every one of those things. It’s what the Republican party wants and Romney showed in Massachusetts that he has no core values of his own to get in the way.
82 posted on
04/30/2012 2:44:03 PM PDT by
JediJones
(From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
To: sthguard
How refreshing to read some common sense here! And from a person of unquestioned conservative principles.
100 posted on
04/30/2012 7:54:16 PM PDT by
citizen
(A)
To: sthguard
If he were elected, at least he would not leave the country to run for some other job as he did when he was our Governor. So at least we have that going for us.
116 posted on
04/30/2012 8:54:09 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
To: sthguard
Anyone who thinks they can predict what lying Mitt will do is fooling themselves.
Herman Cain should just sit down and shut up at this point. He's already made a big enough fool of himself or one election cycle.
117 posted on
04/30/2012 8:57:54 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Sorry, gone rogue.)
To: sthguard
>>>Nine horrendous Obama decisions Mitt Romney would never have made
Lipstick on a pig.
There are dozens of things Willard has done, and decisions he has made that are miles away from conservatism. He can not call “do over”.
The establishment Republican Party has left me... in the dust.
148 posted on
05/02/2012 5:19:01 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
To: sthguard
In fairness, Cain should also mention nine of Obama’s leftist efforts that have been (or would be) stopped by the GOP in Congress, but which they’d have let Romney get away with out of party loyalty.
163 posted on
05/02/2012 9:05:13 PM PDT by
Sloth
(If a tax break counts as "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should be a "deposit.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson