[sickoflibs]

RE :”7. Hold Mitt’s feet to the fire like we did when Bush appointed Harriet Myers to the SC.
8. Win more than we lose (Mitt is by no means perfect, but we have a small chance to shape his decisions. We have zero chance with Obama).”

Republicans only started opposing some stuff Bush did after he was safely elected ~ 2005, and the result of having to do that was hardly pretty : 2009 major power switch. It's a plan for disaster.

If Obama wins Republicans will try to oppose what he does, but if we get a liberal with a Republican label then he gets a blank check for the first four years to give in on anything he wants. Admit it, you have NO idea what a Romney-care would do in the WH.

[Tulane]

Admit it, you have NO idea what a Romney-care would do in the WH.

---

I do know what Obama would do in the WH...I think a second-term-Obama with nothing to lose would be even worse than his first.

I’ll take my chances with a moderate republican. Mitt isn’t my first, second or third choice. Obama is much worse.