Dont disagree with you, Joe. But my point is that if the official position of this site is that neither candidate can be supported, then there is really no point in having the discussion.
Its like if we were to start a Coke Vs. Pepsi thread, but one of the ground rules was that we could praise neither Coke or Pepsi, under threat of zot. By definition, the only thing you could really have is pages of people saying “Coke Sucks” or “Pepsi Sucks”.....which once that is said, its really not doing anything constructive to just repeat that over and over. Rather than getting everyone all mad or temppting people to cross a line and get zotted, just say on this site, there is no point in having the discussion, heres the official position in favor of RC Cola, and lets move on to other things.
Good examples. Thanks.
Very sane comments. Thanks.
“...heres the official position in favor of RC Cola...”
Good points...although I have no idea who the “RC Cola” is that’s favored by the official position of this site.
Exactly true. And there is nothing particularly noble, conservative, free or rebellious about that.
You are right