Jim has told these people that he will vote his conscience and they can vote according to theirs. He also said that he will not allow promotions of Mitt on this site. Apparently that is not good for them. The spinning that I see earlier in this thread is remarkable.
I have been following these threads closely, even though I have not posted regularly. Nobody has been zotted for saying that they will vote Romney in the general. To imply that people got zotted for saying that they will vote for Romney, is trying to be a rabble rouser and trouble maker on this forum.
I assume you are right.
I do not follow such threads much at all because I see the whole political charade and farce re the SElection to be absurdly false.
I no longer believe that any of our votes make a microscopic bit of difference. I don’t believe they have for a very long time.
It is all psych-ops manipulation by the power brokers as well as rigged corrupt vote counting etc. etc. etc.
I think the oligarchy are masters at getting us to fight among ourselves on things that do NOT MAKE A BIT OF DIFFERENCE.
Personally, I think getting OThuga out of office is a higher priority than his fraternal twin Mitt Marxist Romney’s ALMOST equal evils.
And, it APPEARS that the oligarchy has decided to install Mitt next. Or, perhaps they are watching to see how the populace is manipulated successfully and then will decide at the last minute which to install this Nov.
I’m just 100% convinced that our votes do NOT decide ANY of the major SElections at all.
So, all the Romney etc. stuff to me personally is just meaningless blather at MOST levels.
Nevertheless, a LOT OF HONORABLE, TRULY CONSERVATIVE FREEPERS have been unnecessarily hurt by a lot of that blather. That GRIEVES ME A LOT.
We don’t need that. FR doesn’t need that. The Republic doesn’t need that. There’s no benefit to our cause from that.
People can speak their convictions without shredding someone’s personhood.
IF conservatives cannot do so, then we are like Christians blathering the Bible without walking the walk.
We can disagree without being disagreeable. Or, I thought we could.
The more FR seems like a romper room for 2 year olds throwing 2 year tantrums and epithets at one another for silly reasons . . . the more people HAVE to wonder why they bother with it.
“He also said that he will not allow promotions of Mitt on this site.”
I am willing to follow that rule (it’s Jim’s site), but I am still not clear on what is a considered a “promotion.” Maybe that is still being worked out.
So true, and so obvious in its simplicity.