“Wait till you see who Romney picks for the Supreme Court.”
So you claim to read his mind or have special insights? So, just who is he going to nominate?
Well, not to interrupt, but he does have a history. I think he chose 27(?) judges while governor, and all were exceedingly liberal to say the least. They don't come any further to the left.
So, I believe it's safe to assume he'd stick to his old habits. Is there any reason to think otherwise?
Don't need to read his mind. Just look at his record.
Romney judicial record: Liberals Running wild
An excerpt from the above link...
Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.
Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.
“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.
“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”
Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments....
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. -- George Santayana
Romney has a history. Learn it. Remember it.