Good lord, on a Mitt Romney thread after five years of this you think that someone playing games with “no Romney man has ever served the United States as a military man” by pretending that it means any human with the name Romney, is some kind of a big homerun smash of a Romney rebuttal?
Then you want to defend 170 years of his family’s military avoidance (their entire history in America) by telling us that Mitt married in 1969 and his dad was 34 when WWII started, do you know how tired we conservatives are of having to repeat our exposure of Romney to you people over and over, year after year?
Besides the obvious, of Mitt’s father trying to be a war time president while his son is avoiding the draft in France, and then that son, trying to become a war time president, while his five military age sons avoid military service.
There is the fact that conservatives started looking at this odd situation and then discovered that the family has always avoided military service, not that they had physical problems, or skipped a generation or two, but that it was a firm, dedicated family tradition, since the Romneys are dedicated anti-conservatives, it is a disturbing revelation to learn about this record.
I didn’t take it as a Romney rebuttal. What I imagined was a Rumpelstiltskin type character stamping his feet in frustration and, not getting the joke, furiously typing his next barrage.
You might have something worth sharing, but you present it as a jumbled muddle and it’s hard to understand your point. I did a little research and the Wikipedia articles diminished your standing as a factual source. You’ve not rebutted that or directed to any clarifying information. I get the whole Romney RINO thing, but this military service meme is silly. No need to reply unless you’ve got some lucid info.