Something I just realized. Didn’t the prosecutor admit yesterday that they have no evidence to support the claim that Zimmerman confronted Martin? If so, then they are specifically NOT using what was in the latter part of the Dee-Dee “interview” where it was claimed that Trayvon had apparently been pushed.
If that was really part of the interview with the girl, then why would they not use that, just like they used her claims about Trayvon being scared?
What I don’t understand is how the prosecutors - who are supposed to tell the WHOLE truth and disclose any evidence that refutes their claims - can get away with not saying that the 911 caller said it was Zimmerman calling for help, or a myriad of other pieces of evidence that strongly refute the claims in that probable cause affidavit.
This whole thing just really, REALLY stinks.
There’s speculation that there are two different female voices on the abc “Deedee” video. (00:56)
http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-crucial-phone/story?id=15959017
Trayvon's father reported that the police told him what Zimmerman had said, namely that Trayvon came up to him twice, once when he was in his vehicle and again after he had left the vehicle. Trayvon's father said he thought Zimmerman was lying.
What more evidence do you need? Zimmerman is obviously guilty. You only need two witnesses to prove treason, and here we have three.