No, that was another fabrication from ABC. If you read the whole blog page that’s the source for this post you’ll see that ABC is in deep, deep doo-doo.
Somebody should do a voice analysis of the ABC “interview” with “Dee Dee”, to see if the voice before the break to the ABC reporter is the same voice as the one after the break (the voice which claims she heard the confrontation).
And somebody should check out what ABC has to say about the 911 call from Trayvon’s phone on March 2nd when Martin was dead but 16 days before Trayvon’s dad says he was able to get into TRayvon’s phone.
I’d also like to know why Trayvon’s dad had TRayvon’s phone if it was on TRayvon’s person when he died. Whether it was found by the police or by the coroner, I would have thought it would be submitted as evidence in the case.
Way, way too many discrepancies, and it sure seems like ABC is in the middle of them all. I wonder if even one percent of what ABC has presented is actually genuine.
My theory on that is that the 911 call is the Sanford Police calling themselves in order to discover the phone's number. If the phone was passworded, the police would not have been able to examine its directory entries and logs without first breaking the password. However, passworded phones can be used to call 911 without entering the password. If I'm correct, it's odd that it took them until 2 March to get around to it.