Posted on 04/20/2012 5:48:42 PM PDT by Nachum
The office of the Los Angeles County coroner has completed its investigation into the death of Andrew Breitbart on March 1, and has confirmed that he died of natural causes, namely heart failure.
Chief Coroner Investigator Craig Harvey told Breitbart News that the final autopsy report would be released next week.
A press release issued by the Department of Coroner (below) notes: "No prescription or illicit drugs were detected. The blood alcohol was .04%," a negligible amount.
The press release concludes: "No significant trauma was present and foul play is not suspected."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Did you see hits that were intended to threaten the survivors? If so, was the timing the way to get the threatening message across while still having plausible deniability because it could be explained as a “natural death”?
See, it’s a delicate situation to have the death be an obvious assassination to those who are supposed to shut up as a result of the assassination, and yet not be obvious to anybody else because the general public isn’t supposed to know that the US government does assassinations. To my way of thinking, the timing would be the critical element.
And in Breitbart’s case, he died less than 5 hours after telling Sheriff Joe that his evidence of Obama’s BC and draft registration forgery and fraud was good. The same day as Arpaio’s presser announcing probable cause for those crimes. And the same day as Rush Limbaugh received a bomb scare.
It just occurred to me now that the bomb scare for Rush may have been in the works as the big story for the press to cover instead of Arpaio’s presser, but the people listening in on Breitbart may have heard his comments to Arpaio and feared that he would report on Arpaio’s findings if they didn’t get rid of him, so they did away with him and that ended up being the big story. The Rush thing still happened as scheduled but even it was overshadowed by the emergency assassination they had to do as a result of Breitbart’s phone conversation with Arpaio.
In any event, it worked. The press didn’t report Arpaio’s evidence - that day or any day since. Breitbart’s company says it’s still going to vet Obama but they won’t touch Obama’s BC and draft forgery and fraud - claiming those federal felonies aren’t important enough to report. (Somebody who spoke to Andrew’s close friends said they were aware that it was an assassination, and their censorship of just that one issue, Obama’s eligibility, says they know that was what the assassination was about) Sean Hannity had responded to Breitbart’s death by saying he would fully vet Obama no matter what the cost (indicating he knew there would be a cost) - and scheduled to have Mike Zullo of Arpaio’s posse on his show. But then at the last minute Fox cancelled.
The ducks all line up in a row.
Well.... we now know that the day before this report came out, one of the technicians in the coroner’s office was killed by arsenic poisoning... Seems like he was the person who sometimes did the photographing for special cases. May have been the one who photographed Andrew’s body.
The only indicator of a heart attack dart assassination is the prick-hole where the dart entered the body. If the photos of the body were either manipulated or replaced, the guy who took the photos would be one of the few people to know. And he may be the guy who was killed the day before this report came out.
Does that help convince you that the coroner’s office is above being corrupted?
Keep in mind that we already know of 2 issues related to Obama’s eligibility where threats were made. The media was threatened if they reported the eligibility issue, and the Clintons gave up their plans to reveal Obama’s ineligibility after Bill’s good friend (the chairman of the Arkansas Democratic Party, Bill Gwatney) was killed shortly after he agreed to present a petition to the DNC Convention. The person who agreed to do it in his place, Stephanie Tubbs, died of a supposed anyeurism within days of agreeing to do so. This all happened within about a week, and the Clintons gave up on pursuing Obama’s eligibility problem.
Andrew Breitbart had spoken with Joe Arpaio less than 5 hours before his death, and told Joe that his evidence of Obama’s fraud and forgery were good and that he was glad it would be reported.
The coroner’s office has now issued two different statements which contradict Andrew’s close friends’ claims that he was being treated for heart problems: the statement that he had not seen a doctor in over a year, and the toxicology finding that there were no prescription drugs in his body. Somebody who has spoken to Breitbart’s close friends said in an interview with Jerry Corsi that those friends know it was an assassination. Which explains why they are so adamant about their claims which are contradicted by the coroner’s statements.
Melancholy, butterdezillion makes a series of excellent comments.
If potassium poisoning was done through a drink would there be any way of knowing it was potassium poisoning?
How fast would death come from potassium in a drink? How fast would it come from poison in a heart attack dart? Is it an instant thing?
How fast does arsenic poisoning kill somebody? Does it have to be ingested, or can it also be supplied through a dart? The guy who may have photographed Breitbart’s body is believed to have died from arsenic poisoning at 10:30pm on the day the toxicology results were reported. (I had earlier said the day before the results were reported but I’ve seen more detailed/accurate reports now.)
Are either potassium or arsenic able to tasted if they are ingested?
Do you know much about how a coroner’s office works?
Also, do you know if a death certificate is on hold until the final cause of death is determined when there is an autopsy?
The two things the coroner’s office has said which relate to the questions you asked are these: the coroner’s office said right away that Breitbart hadn’t seen a doctor for over a year, and now the toxicology report says there were no prescription or illicit drugs in his body. What does that suggest to you regarding his heart history?
In a previous post I asked heartweb some questions about potassium and arsenic poisoning; since you’re a medical person, any insight you might have about those things would be greatly appreciated as well. =)
RIP Breitbart, we miss you.
I don't know how to verify all your claims, but heart failure, barring recent ischemia or an acute valve problem, is a chronic condition.
By “chronic condition” I meant a known health problem that he was being treated for. His father-in-law initially said that he knew of no heart problems for Andrew and then the stories started changing, getting progressively worse as there was more talk about whether he could have been assassinated with a heart attack gun. I think the latest version had him in the hospital for a couple weeks with a massive heart attack sometime within the last year.
The same news report that had the father-in-law saying he knew of no heart problems for Andrew also said the spokesman for the coroner’s office said that Andrew hadn’t seen a doctor for over a year. Neither that, nor the toxicology result finding no prescription drugs in his system fits the stories that his friends were saying.
Someone who had spoken to several of Breitbart’s close friends said in an interview with Jerome Corsi that contrary to what was being said in public, his friends know that it was an assassination. The public stories are disinformation because they are scared.
And there is no question that they are scared. When Mark Gillar interviewed Ben Shapiro, Ben said that the Breitbart “bigs” weren’t going to address Arpaio’s findings - probable cause for forgery and fraud on Obama’s BC and draft registration - because those federal felonies just aren’t important enough to talk about. That’s not what Andrew Breitbart told Joe Arpaio over the phone less than 5 hours before he was killed. Breitbart said Joe’s evidence was good and that he was glad Arpaio was going public with it.
Sean Hannity, in response to Breitbart’s death, said he would thoroughly vet Obama no matter what it cost. He scheduled Mike Zullo, head of Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, to be on his show. But at the last minute Fox canceled.
Now the guy who may have photographed Breitbart’s body - revealing the only sign of an assassination by heart attack gun (a small red entry hole) - seems to have been killed by arsenic poisoning, during the phase after the finding the public would take at face value (the toxicology report, which would not show anything fishy if a heart attack gun was used) but before the full autopsy was finished (which would include the photos of the body).
Definitely suspicious stuff going on.
Ghigliotti died suddenly of a heart attack shortly before the Waco trial.
It seems like people who work in the labs that investigate Democrats end up like the Red Shirts on Star Trek. They never make it to the final scene.
-PJ
By "chronic condition" I mean it in the medical sense. Due to compensation many people don't know they have heart failure and many times the first symptom is sudden death. Here's an example at this link.
I am afraid I am of no help to you, and your looking into this matter. Some things do not add up.
I might also add that the coroner might be sensitive to much of the commentary on various blogs about concerns of someone sympathetic to obama, and might hold off the release. This is just speculation on my part. Or the family might have made a request to hold off as long as possible.
Right. It can happen. But that wouldn’t explain why his close friends would lie about him having a heart attack within the past year. The discrepancies between the initial claims and the later claims is what caught my attention. And now it conflicts with what’s in the toxicology results also.
Yes, hits were designed to intimidate people who understood that they were hits. In the specific case I mentioned, attorneys would not fail to notice that everyone who sued the corporation died a violent accidental death at a critical moment.
The MSM and Sheeple are totally numb. However, the message is not lost on those who are tuned in.
Arsenic is suspected in the death of the coroner’s tech. The one who does photography. There are some threads about it. I’ll fetch a link after I post this.
Would you think that the coroner’s office would have a person who specialized in photographing the bodies - somebody who knew what the coroner would be looking for, what kind of detail was necessary, how to get the required shots/angles, how to label the views, etc? Sort of like a sonographer knows how to take pictures in the womb (for instance)?
The guy who died of what they believe is arsenic poisoning was a photographer for the coroner’s office. Would I be out of line in thinking that he may have photographed Breitbart’s body? He died the night of the day the toxicology results were announced.
If Breitbart hadn’t seen a doctor for over a year, that would necessarily mean that he hadn’t been hospitalized for 2 weeks after a massive heart attack within the last year, as claimed by his “close friends”. Right?
I’ll fetch that link.
Here’s a link to a thread about the coroner’s technician who is thought to have died from arsenic poisoning:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877618/posts
Funny how that happens, considering that the President has control over the CIA which has a handy-dandy heart attack gun...
And would you say that the timing of the deaths was a primary way to make a supposedly “natural death” known as an assassination?
Would you say that the people who were threatened by a suspiciously-timed “natural death” went out of their way to agree that the death was “natural”, or would they typically speak out to show that the death was an assassination?
placemark.
This also explains why Bill and Hillary were scared out of bringing up Obama’s eligibility as they had intended, when Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs were killed at critical points right before the DNC Convention in 2008 - even though they themselves have Secret Service protection. Bill, having been President (and having used them) was very aware that there are assassination techniques that bodyguards can’t necessarily protect you from. Having had a heart attack once already, Bill would be a prime candidate to use the heart attack gun on, and somebody could easily get within range to use it even with a bodyguard.
The family fled to another state (Texas) after Ray was murdered! At the time, I was young and naive enough to think it odd. After the government guy (GS14) told me about the other killings by that corporation, I understood.
Most people have a hard time wrapping their minds around this fact: In America there are various actors including organized crime, ruthless wealthy people with plenty of resources, major corporations, unions, and political groups who MURDER those who trouble them.
Of course, such murdering groups are a minority, but they definitely exist in the real world and not just in Hollywood scripts.
I had an acquaintance who committed armed robbery as a young man and got off with a slap on the wrist after hiring the right lawyers and paying off the right people. He also used a thug for collections. The deadbeats owed him money for sure and he was going to get it!
I lived in a small city where a cop confided in me that by paying off the pols anybody could get away with any crime.
Recently, I became aware of a case where a hazardous waste disposal company run by a foreign mobster dumped an incredible amount of pollutants in a bayou here. The EPA finally shut him down after years of evidence. However, he walks the streets a free man today. Who did he pay off? He would have to pay off the state regulators as well as EPA officials.
America is becoming more Third World in a lot of ways. If we don’t clean up the corruption it will get worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.