Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792

1 posted on 04/19/2012 12:57:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

2 posted on 04/19/2012 12:59:26 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
I guess this means I have to vote for Ubama.

When Hell freezes over.

3 posted on 04/19/2012 12:59:46 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (For every black person murdered by a white, thirty-nine white people are murdered by blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

There is no real Romney.


4 posted on 04/19/2012 1:03:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I think we all know we are screwed.


5 posted on 04/19/2012 1:05:41 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (If Romney needs my vote to win Mississippi, he is in a heck of a lot trouble more than me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

all this might be true...but it’s pointless. The first priority is to defeat Obama...nothing else matters for the future of the country


8 posted on 04/19/2012 1:10:15 PM PDT by rman04554
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Romney’s purpose is not to be a RINO president.

Romney’s purpose is being enacted right now - to split the Republican Party between RINO’s and conservatives, and thereby lose the election to the Democrats, in EXACTLY the same way McCain threw the election to Obama the last time.

We NEED a brokered convention - or a third Party able to outvote the other two. Because if it’s not Romney, it will always be some other RINO. That’s what the machine DOES - and it’s the Democrat machine I’m talking about. Who other than the Democrats could so perfectly pick, protect and annoint their preferred competition? The fact of the matter is that a RINO Republican Party IS NO Republican Party - it’s merely a closely-held adjunct of the Democrat Party.

What people are starting to dimly perceive is that there’s only ONE Party at this time, and that’s the problem.


16 posted on 04/19/2012 1:21:25 PM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Where was this Document Last July?


23 posted on 04/19/2012 1:50:39 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/mitt_romney_a_liberals_liberal_republican.html

Mitt Romney: A Liberal’s Liberal Republican

“”But should Romney be the GOP’s presidential nominee? The answer is “absolutely not.”

Although there is no “perfect conservative,” and although conservatives have serious issues with every candidate running, Mitt Romney is nothing more than a strident liberal masquerading as a moderate. As Selwyn Duke rightly wrote in 2007, Romney is the Barack Obama of the GOP. Every Republican has made his share of mistakes, but Romney is a committed liberal on the whole spectrum of issues.

Conservatives know that Romney was pro-abortion for a long time before he first ran for the presidency in 2007, at which time he “changed his position” because he was now asking for the votes of conservatives. Romney has also supported “gay rights,” and as Massachusetts governor, he implemented same-sex marriage by executive fiat.

In 2004, the MA Supreme Court ruled that the state’s marriage law was unconstitutional — but the Court did not rule, contrary to what is claimed, that gay marriage must be legalized and that the state constitution contains a “right” to marry. Yet, as soon as the ruling was issued, Romney commanded state agencies, by executive order, to start issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples.

Romney is stridently liberal on fiscal and economic issues. He did not initially support the Bush tax cuts; he has long opposed (and continues to oppose) the flat tax, calling it “a tax cut for fat cats”; he used fee hikes and “loophole-closing measures” to balance the Massachusetts state budget; and when he found items in it which he deemed wasteful or uneccessary, such as $30 million per year for hotel rooms for homeless people, he spent such sums on something else rather than use them to balance the budget.”


29 posted on 04/19/2012 2:45:39 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; Jim Robinson

If you would put as much energy in getting Obama out as you do spamming all day we would be much better. I am believing that you are a Rat Mole.

I will not defend Romney but you are defending the re-election of Obama.

You are dangerous and if Jim doesn’t reel you in there are MANY that are going to leave this site.

You are nothing but a stalker and someone needs to put a restrainting order on you. You are a kook!


31 posted on 04/19/2012 4:48:08 PM PDT by mmanager (NEWT - The Chruchill of our time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson