Replies

It's hard to believe that you are finding a way to validate another 4 years of Obama, as well as you are going out of your way to help him get reelected.

Your lame projections are also traitorous, since you don't realize that Obama will use the next 4 years to load the courts from district level to SCOTUS. And your theory that Obama will be held in check by the legislation, it looks like the outcome of the last 4 years, completely destroys your claim that Obama has been kept under control, since he has resorted to Executive privilege to circumvent Congress and the Senate.

The next 4 years of Obama will end all doubt that the Republic is doomed.

ABO, there is no other option.

"It's hard to believe that you are finding a way to validate another 4 years of Obama, as well as you are going out of your way to help him get reelected."

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE!

Your lame projections are also traitorous, since you don't realize that Obama will use the next 4 years to load the courts from district level to SCOTUS.

As opposed to the way Romney selected liberal judges in Massachusetts? And made gay marriages possible? Either candidate is going to bring liberal judges.

And your theory that Obama will be held in check by the legislation, it looks like the outcome of the last 4 years, completely destroys your claim that Obama has been kept under control, since he has resorted to Executive privilege to circumvent Congress and the Senate

And Romney has a record of that too. See Romney's involvment in gay marriages. Both Romney and Obama have links to Alinsky. I'll say it again. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE!

If we are going to embrace liberalism anyway, let it be a democrat at the helm, while we try to figure out either how to fix the Republican party, or grow a new one like the Constitution party to be viable.