Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus
The point is that only two people know exactly what happened and one of them killed the other.

Absent a new mystery eye-witness who is absolutely reliable we will never know the facts.

I am not willing to accept Zimmerman's version as anything but CYA. I would feel the same if the roles were reversed.

41 posted on 04/14/2012 9:20:53 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
The only one who knows with 100% certainty what happened is Zimmerman, and obviously he has no incentive to say anything that puts him in the wrong.

The emergency medical people and the police who saw him minutes after the shooting should be able to testify to what they saw, I imagine. There were two or more witnesses who heard and perhaps saw the fight--maybe not all of it but at least some of it. The police should know who they are and Zimmerman can compel them to testify (at least the sixth amendment says he can--but maybe that doesn't apply since it is the state of Florida bringing the charges rather than the federal government).

Fortunately, I've never been a plaintiff or defendant in any criminal or civil trial, and I've never gone to law school, but I think the defense is supposed to have access to any exculpatory evidence. Of course if the prosecution hides it and they don't know about it, tough luck for Zimmerman.

43 posted on 04/14/2012 12:08:14 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson