[Al B.]

When you look at the ND state and private landowner take in ND, it's about 33%. Amanda Coyne at the Alaska Dispatch made the case that ND's 33% compares to Alaska's 39%. She states that there is a discrepancy but it's not the wild-eyed 85% vs 11% that some of the Big 3's proponents make.

She also makes the case that Alaska's state take on oil compares very favorably to other places in the world, including TX and LA when you factor in the private landowner take.

Myth-busting claims in Alaska's oil tax debate: Part I

There's also a Part II lined in the above article.

I don't like taxes period, but there should be an agreement between rational people based on truth when it comes to sharing profits between resource owners and operators. I certainly agree that the marginal curve under ACES probably needs changing to further incentivize operators when prices are high, but nothing like the giveaway that the Big 3 are demanding in exchange for....nothing but words.

[thackney]

You quote the Dispatch and then complain about my sources???

http://www.bwenergylaw.com/News/documents/NorthDakotaStateLeasestoCarryaHigherRoyaltyRate.pdf

The state royalty rate is 1/6, they have considered raising to 3/16 or even 1/5. A high rate, but I don’t see anything approaching 33% with the tax added.

http://bismarcktribune.com/news/local/state-looking-to-get-more-money-for-oil-on-state/article_1ec89df6-4322-11e1-a71c-001871e3ce6c.html