Posted on 04/10/2012 2:12:34 PM PDT by Kaslin
LOL. I was here before you and you are telling me to take a hike? Yeah right lady. Some of your super polite and courteous gems from the past.
What you santos people worried about Newt for. Get over it. Santos will never be the nominee. Earth to hello. He can’t even stop Romney so how can he stop Obama.
32 posted on Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:22:59 PM by Christie at the beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2868106/posts?page=32#32
And now you are telling me to vote Newt in PA when he is in mid single digits BEHIND PAUL. Does the fact that he get's beat by Paul in some contests matter to you if Rick losing to Romney by inches in big states is a disqualifier? You better get your spin straight. As you said to another Santorum supporter on another thread: "I have a memory so when the new attitude comes, it is not becoming."
Die Rockin'. Over and out good buddy.
I will NEVER vote for mitt so it looks like I can save a trip to the voting booth this fall.
This Pennsylvania family will be voting NEWT...and hope a new political party is formed to destroy the GOP completely.
I weep for the country we once had and is almost completely lost at this point of time..
Ah, found your mistake. See the truth is the Republican party is not conservative. People like us here on FR are conservatives WITHIN the Republican party, but the party itself is not conservative. Come on now, think about it. In modern history the GOP is the party of Ike, Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., and GW Bush. Only Reagan was conservative, and even then not nearly as conservative as many of us on FR and among the grass roots. His election was certainly a push in the right direction, but the 80's were hardly a truly conservative era.
Every election cycle conservatives like us try to push the party to the right (to be more conservative), and the establishment tries to hug the middle to win elections. This is basically what you can always expect in a 2 party system with no chance of coalition government. I'm not saying this is good or right, but it is the dynamic that has persisted for a very long time. You also have to remember that in a 2 party system like ours, defeating the opposition is regarded by many, perhaps even most, as equally important as advancing your own ideology (especially for the establishment/moderate types who are not really all that unhappy with the way things are anyway).
Once you dramatically reduce your expectations of the Grand Old Party, you'll feel better :)
Mistake?
Far from it!
Well, yes.
I really Like Newt. I just wish they had him and Santorum started campaigning sooner like a year sooner then they did!
I really Like Newt. I just wish they had, him and Santorum started campaigning sooner like a year sooner then they did!
If Mittens is smart he will pick a Conservative as VP—Newt? That is the only way I will vote for the guy. Still, I do not like the fellow in the White House as I see he’s doing a poor job—Even for a Democrat. If he was an effective leader I would not mind his Birth place or skin color. But, he is not—he’s a token for radical unions and such. I fully expected him to do something for Blacks in the Ghetto—and he has made things worse for them! He needs to voted out of office!
No, forget it. Romney and that Yacht Club crowd are toxic, they're radioactive. Don't touch them with a 10-foot pole. Remember how Poppy Bush screwed up Ronald Reagan's administration with his "pigs at the trough" appointments at Treasury, Commerce, and so on ..... remember "Silent Sam"? Another Bush genius pick, like David Souter for AJ.
Too, I think it was Poppy who found Alan Greenspan for us, for the Federal Reserve. How's that one working out for us? (Okay, I'll give him Clarence, that was a good appointment.) Greenspan? As in, the "Greenspan Put"?
Don't go near Manor Bush and the GOP-e. The stink of death emanates from them.
No, even if Willard trips your gag reflex causing you to vote third-party, be sure to vote down-ballot, it's important, and we can still win big, even if the GOP-e and Willard produce a cluster**** at the presidential level.
ROMNEY = Four (or eight) more years of Øbamanomics.
"If Mittens is smart he will pick a Conservative as VP—Newt? "
I figure Bishop Romney and Lawyer Ricky have had a deal to put Ricky on the ticket as VP ever since Lawyer Ricky went home to "file his taxes" for a few weeks. Pulling out right about now fits with that hand and glove. Ricky was just a means to draw support away from Newt, nothing more, nothing less. He spent the vast majority of his money attacking Newt and as soon as he starts damaging Bishop Romney in primaries, poof, he's gone.
Lawyer Ricky will be more than happy to have a wealthier and better connected client list, but if Bishop Romney wants him as VP, I'm sure Lawyer Ricky will go along to get along just like he always has and just like his voting record proves he does. Lawyer Ricky has made a fool of an awful lot of folks who decided that they'd rather believe the record Lawyer Ricky has doesn't count just exactly the same way people believed that the record King Barry had didn't count.
What? Pope Sanctimonious?
Your ilk, with their fixation on needing the next coming of Jesus for President drove me and mine *FAR* away.
In 2008, I said that if Huckabee took the nomination, I’d tear up my Republican voter registration card.
And in 2012, I was saying the same thing about Santorum.
Limited government, low taxes, states’ rights.
That’s what *IS* America. You saw that in the TEA parties.
What you did *NOT* see is the idea that the President should be our national pastor/priest/rabbi/imam/whatever.
stop paying for cable TV.
stop reading FR.
become a hermit.
Amen brother. Some people can’t accept the fact that there has been a fundamental realignment. The Tea Party movement is a “get government out of my life” coalition, not a vehicle to crack down on perceived societal ills. Once people start yammering about cracking down on internet pornography and the evils of contraception the coalition blows apart.
I get it. You hate Christians. I really don’t care one wit what you have to say on the matter. Celebrate. You have your wish granted. The good non Christian, pro Abortionist Milt Romney is getting the nomination. Now go on and make sure there are no crosses in public buildings that offend you and leave me alone.
Oh, I get you better than you think.
You believe that if one doesn’t want a Pope for President, that one just *HATES* Christians.
You believe that if someone doesn’t want the government controlling their ability to use the internet, a la China, one just *HATES* Christianity.
You believe that if someone wants their Presidential candidate to be for limited-government, low taxes, and states’ right... that person *HATES* Jesus.
Yeah, it shows me what you consider “Christian”.
And your view of “Christianity” is a totalitarian police-state, where the elected G-d-King tells you what is right/wrong and has the power to make you OBEY.
North Korea is your utopia. Just scratch out “Juche” and “Kim Il-Sung” and replace them with “Christianity” and “Jesus”. That is exactly what you’re advocating.
So, yeah... I hate *YOUR* view of “Christianity”.
Seriously, look at yourself and ask “What do I consider conservative values?” If there isn’t any revulsion towards a powerful government *REGARDLESS* of the party in power... then you aren’t conservative. Period - full stop - end of story. You would be a Christian Liberal.
Now, I figure you’ll just take this post to mean “He murdered Christ with a hatchet and ate his flesh/drank his blood. Cannibal!!!” I mean, just look at how you took my last one.
:-P
How many babies have you eaten today?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.