[Chainmail]

I would add another reason: they are unethical cowards. They know that it will be an unpopular case and they won't get rich.

Buzzards should be disbarred.

[abb]

I would add another reason: they are unethical cowards. They know that it will be an unpopular case and they won't get rich.

And Zimmerman finally figured this out. They would have sold him out in a heartbeat.

[DaveyB]

They know that it will be an unpopular case and they won't get rich.

If it goes to trial, they would be able to showcase themselves as a voice of representation against reverse bigotry and media lynching. That's when the money comes, after the are famous not now.

My guess-- they know it is not going to trial and it will not get them the lime light. The fools have now shown themselves to be craven ambulance chasers that will jump ship if the work is not personally rewarding enough. A double blunder in my opinion: lose the chance to establish a real reputation and instead create a reputation of abandoning a client when the heat was not to their liking.

[LonelyCon]

They know that it will be an unpopular case and they won't get rich. Buzzards should be disbarred.

Really? Really?

The state should take away their ability to practice their chosen profession because they don't want to be involved in this case (for whatever reason) and they won't make money? How about doctors? You want the state to take away their licenses if they refuse to perform procedures they don't want to be involved with and won't make money? And what about your profession, whatever that is? If you refuse a job because you won't make money or just don't want to be a part of things, should the government stop you from working again in that field?