To: DNA.2012
>>He should not have to buy a right to parent via payments to his child’s mother as listed in this anti-father legislation.<<
Keep it zipped up until after you are married and a guy has no fear for this law.
But in general, it is yet another attack on men.
2 posted on
04/10/2012 1:30:31 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
To: freedumb2003
Women are not deprived of parental rights for not “keeping it zipped up”, regardless of their marital status.
3 posted on
04/10/2012 1:33:53 PM PDT by
DNA.2012
To: freedumb2003
Look it may be an attack on men, irresponsible men. I do think that someone who takes no financial responsibility for a child should rightly have no say. In many cases single women live in poverty because they have no choice but to raise the child.
Is it fair? NO!!! Is it the way it is for the most part? YES!!
8 posted on
04/10/2012 1:48:22 PM PDT by
w1andsodidwe
(Barrak has nowuwon the contest. He is even worse than Jimmah.)
To: freedumb2003
Seems as though you have never experienced Western divorce court as a white male. You would be in for a rude awakening. Google: “parental alienation”
43 posted on
04/11/2012 9:51:20 AM PDT by
AbolishCSEU
(Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson