[Clara Lou]

So, why don’t you rebut what Bowyer says with specifics instead of calling Forbes a rag and bashing local talk show hosts?

Then, I might believe you. But not now.

[throwback]

Nobody has the time to rebut the whole thing, but here's one. He makes a special point of calling Santorum a liar repeatedly. You try to read the piece where Santorum said X but the author clearly shows that it was not X. I just have a hard time finding these so called “lies” that he claims. Take for the example Santorum says his charitable giving is low because his family is expensive, especially his daughter's care. Well the author claims that is a “lie” because his giving was low before his daughter. How does he know what his cash flow has been? Unless he knows what all of his earnings and expenses are, he doesn't. It's interesting to me that he claims this lie based on the Wallace hit piece before super Tuesday also. Looks to me to be another Repub establishment team player.

[the invisib1e hand]

I don't need to. I think Forbes is a rag, and that local talk show host are buffoons (with few exceptions) - I certainly have no difficulty believing that partisan thought-shaping is their stock-in-trade - and my opinion of them has been established for some time before this thread appeared.

The point was that the establishment is petrified of anyone with a backbone. Since Santorum is avowedly against abortion, I don't think it needs further proof.