*******
I have some questions about this Coats 1962 long form birth certificate:
1. Lee, the registrar signature: Why is Lee's signature on the Coats' long form and on Obama's long form, but it is not on the Nordyke Aug. 1961 long form from the same hospital?
2. In 1961, was Lee the registrar assigned to Coats' hospital as well as Obama's Kapiolani Hospital?
3. My point is this: We need to look at other long form birth certificates from Kapiolani Hospital from 1961 to make sure that Obama's long form is not the ONLY one from Aug. 1961 that has Lee's signature, while all the others from Aug. 1961 have another registrar's signature.
4. Problem: If Obama's long form is the only one that has Lee's signature in 1961 from Kapiolani Hospital while the others from the same hospital have someone else's signature, then I think Obama has a serious problem and some explaining to do.
5. Maria Coats signature compared to Stanley's signature: Look how Coats signature is on the line, while Stanley's signature does not touch the line. Why is that?
6. World Net Daily: In an article at World Net Daily, a computer expert wrote that it was humanely impossible for a person to write his name along that line like Stanley did and not touch the line .
7. In fact, the computer expert wrote that Stanley's signature was perfectly aligned along the line, and it missed touching the line exactly one pixel along the entire length of the signature, which, according to the expert, only a computer could do so perfectly.
8. Again, if Lee's signature is only on Obama's long form from Kapiolani Hospital and not on others from the same hospital and from the same 1961 year---NOTE: we know that Lee's signature is legitimate because we have his signature on the long form birth certificate of Maria Coats from another hospital in 1962--- then I say that Obama has a lot of explaining to do.
Good questions and good points. I wish I knew the answers.
Not terribly important but for the record, I just checked back a year ago and someone had found that the initials are really VKL Lee. V for Verna. Written quickly the V looks like U.
4. Problem: If Obama's long form is the only one that has Lee's signature in 1961 from Kapiolani Hospital while the others from the same hospital have someone else's signature, then I think Obama has a serious problem and some explaining to do.
*******
This is mirse. My theory above is wrong, because I just saw a Kapiolani birth certificate dated Aug. 23,1961 with V.R. Lee's signature.
I saw it in a 2011 article Corsi wrote at World Net Daily. The Lee signature on the certificate in the World Net Daily article is blanked out, but I saw the same certificate with the Lee signature visible at another site.
My point is this: Contrary to what I was thinking, there is indeed evidence that V. Lee also signed other certificates at Kapiolani hospital in Aug. 1961 just like she signed Obama's long form certificate in Aug. 1961.
So my theory is wrong. That is, I had theorized that if Lee signed ONLY Obama's certificate at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug. 1961 and no other ones, then it would prove that Obama's long form certificate was a fake.
But because I have found another legitimate Aug.1961 certificate on the internet from Kapiolani Hospital with Lee's signature on it just like it is on Obama's Aug. 1961 certificate, I must admit that my theory---that Lee could not have signed Obama's certificate in Aug. 1961--- has been proven wrong. Sorry.