Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Komen Races Miss Their Goals
Wall Street Journal ^ | 6/26/2012 | AMY DOCKSER MARCUS AND MELANIE GRAYCE WEST

Posted on 03/27/2012 7:02:55 AM PDT by Badabing Badablonde

The breast-cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure continues to face fallout from its Planned Parenthood controversy, as some affiliates report declines in fundraising and attendance at the group's signature races and a series of high-level executives have departed.

Eric Brinker, a businessman and son of Komen's founder, has stepped down from the charity's board of directors, Komen said. Last week, the head of Komen's Greater New York City affiliate said she would step down.

The nonprofit's decision to stop funding breast-cancer screening and education at Planned Parenthood clinics set off a controversy last month.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Badabing Badablonde
"Pity.....it is a worthwhile cause."

Is it? Serious question. What does the money they raise really go to?

21 posted on 03/27/2012 8:43:55 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

There is a good book to start with, and lots of info on the web. The book is Knockout by Suzanne somers. Forget her cheesy acting on Three’s Company; the book isn’t about her and barely even by her. Each chapter is an interview with specialists, many MDs, who dare to buck the conventional kill-the-baby-with -the -bath water chemotherapy and who cure people or turn their cancer into something manageable that doesn’t make them sick or shorten their lifespan.

I think anyone who has cancer or knows someone with cancer should read it. Then do more research.

One day the balding, weakening, life-shortening chemo may be seen like leeches and bloodletting.

(I’m not saying it hasn’t helped anyone. But we need to be aware of better treatments down the line by changing our paradigm. I grew up thinking cancer patients went bald. )


22 posted on 03/27/2012 8:46:48 AM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - our sole chance to stop the Rominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: apillar
Now they are in a situation where the radical feminists are boycotting because they cut of funding to planned parenthood and the conservative right is boycotting because they restored the funding.

At this point, I don't think the loss of funds is due to the feminists. If they hadn't restored the grants to PP, I betcha the race revenue would still be on target. I might have even ran in one.

23 posted on 03/27/2012 9:16:27 AM PDT by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

Who should give money to a foundation who caves to butchers, not anyone I know anymore, these liberal idiots have managed to set back cancer funding and runs 30 years. Nice job Komen!


24 posted on 03/27/2012 11:28:13 AM PDT by Joshua Marcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; Badabing Badablonde
When some patients are fed only nourishing food and large amounts of deficient hormones, vitamins, etc, they stay well, no sickness, loss of strength, hair, or life, but instead live a full, long life sometimes with a present tumor or even losing it. But even with the breast cancer tumor being present, the patients live a great life, something like people with HIV do. Since this is happening more and more, these moneybags foundations should at least include more support for healthful treatment research rather than focusing only on the pitiable bald chemo patients.

While there is much value in eating nutritiously, there is no evidence that merely eating a healthy diet will slow the spread of cancer. Cancer cells benefit from good nutrition just like any other cells. Furthermore, they tend to grow faster and can be quite aggressive in making sure they get all the nutrients they need. I have used many kinds of cancer cells in research--they *love* good nutrition.

The purpose of chemo and radiotherapy is to kill rapidly growing cells, by interrupting a process like DNA synthesis which happens in growing cells. Unfortunately, some cells grow rapidly but are not cancer cells, which is why the treatments cause such bad side effects. Some current research is based on targeting the chemo drugs directly at the cancer cells, to minimize the number of non-cancer cells killed. Hopefully, those newer targeted therapies will transition to clinical use within the next few years.

What I'm saying is that in the event you ever get cancer (and I sincerely hope you never do), don't rely on diet to save you. You will still need treatment.

25 posted on 03/27/2012 5:43:21 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

Good Riddance, There are many avenues to give to good causes which will receive more of the donated money and none will go to other evil causes.


26 posted on 03/27/2012 5:54:09 PM PDT by jafojeffsurf (Return to the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde
I'm sure there are plenty of other breast cancer orgs out there who would enjoy your support. Sometimes the smaller groups do more with the money because they're not weighted down with infrastructure and admin, like big orgs such as Komen, ACS, etc. Here's a listing of cancer research centers across the country. One near you might have info on other non-profits.
27 posted on 03/27/2012 6:07:43 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

You have to be pretty special to anger both sides of the political spectrum at the same time.


28 posted on 03/27/2012 6:09:10 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

Don’t give to Komen, they are controlled by Planned Parenthood.


29 posted on 03/27/2012 6:14:02 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Thanks. Yes, there are necessary cancer treatments. But there are also some other alternative treatments than chemo. And there are some cancers that can be lived with as a controllable chronic condition. It is time to consider other paradigms than “killing cells.”


30 posted on 03/28/2012 12:27:48 AM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012 - our sole chance to stop the Rominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson