Stick a Fork in Santorum... He's Done

Townhall.com ^ | March 25, 2012 | Doug Giles

[Lucas McCain]

Not quite the worst. Wittle Wicky Santorum would be worse.

[maxwellsmart_agent]

Obama has Obamacare.
Romney has Romneycare.

same thing!

Obama has spoken for abortion.
Romney has spoken for abortion.

same thing!

gay marriage, gays in the military, taxes, etc.

When people vote, they will consider these and say they are the same, why change. And they will surely vote for Obama.

A vote for Romney is a vote to retain Obama.

[dforest]

Maybe those people remember Newt flaunting the fact that he was the southern strategy bigwig for Rockefeller.

No wonder they don’t trust him.

Well, and there is his big support for Cap & Trade.

Of course now that he had his GW supporting book shuffled until after the election. Then he won’t care if it comes out, well, even though he killed the chapter that the lib wrote for is book, which may appear again after he figures out he lost.

There is the real Newt. The only guy that figures folks will buy whatever he says at the moment, which is subject to change, well, if he feels like it.

[death2tyrants]

I’ll tell you what, create a vanity post comparing FR to unions and gloat about Newt being behind in the polls. See how well that goes.

[bigships]

I absolutely agree with Breitbart - ABO. Having said that, I believe Romney is the best candidate to defeat Obama. We need the support of Dems that no longer can support him and all those Ind.

BTW - I’m from MA and Romney is no socialist.

[af_vet_rr]

Romney is the latest version of what is shaping up to be a another chapter in the Republican history in the book of losers. Dole, McCain and now Romney. None of them had a chance with the exception of McCain who went off the reservation to pick Palin as VP.

Actually you're leaving out the Bushes - if you put it into context, for nearly 24 years, since 1988, we've had Republican nominees who are the nominees because it was "their turn" or they had the most money (George W. had both, but jumped ahead of McCain in 2000) and all of them proved themselves to be big government-loving RINOs, and the ones that actually got in the White House ended up turning the keys over to Clinton and Obama.

Romney would continue that tradition if he gets the nomination, and run it up to 28 years, and therefore Santorum is correct in certain aspects of what he's said.

It's actually shocking you when you stop and look at the last 24 years of Republican nominees and what they've managed to do - either increasing the size, power, and expense of the federal government if they actually win, or losing to scumbag Demcorats.

[dps.inspect]

No, I’ll tell YOU what... wait, what are we talking about again, I thought we were done here... movin’ on... by, by..

[Cronos]

I like Santorum, I like Newt. Romney is Obama-lite. he’s not different enough to make any difference to the nation