Posted on 03/25/2012 12:58:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
Nor do I believe Romney would run up our debt and destabilize our economy like BHO has purposely done....I do.
No, like Santorum said, there is not enough difference between Romney and Obama for Romney to beat him, so a vote for Romney supports four more years of Obama.
A socialist is as a socialist does. Just ask the people of Massachusetts about Romneycare.
I guess it all comes down to whether or not Romney is a globalist...
I can’t stand Romney.... But....
I, for one, will certainly NOT be sitting home pouting this election day, that’s for sure.
Great article from Doug. I agree with his feelings 100%. (Little Ricky IS toast.) But, the only problem is that Romney is a disaster with the caps lock ON. And he can't come close to winning the general against Obama. I heard today that some poll has Mitt at 40%. So 60% is against him, and that's not going to get better.
The idiot republican party has an excellent chance of nominating this Mitt, and if it does, we will have another four years of Obama. If, by a very remote chance Mitt doesn't get the 1144, and we have an open convention, we might get saved. I'm for Newt, but I'm open for MANY others- Sarah, Ryan, DeMint, even Hucabee (never thought I'd say that, but he would be preferable to Mitt) and there are several others that I would prefer over Mitt.
Like Doug said ABO
There, I fixed it.
Let me know after Romney wins Louisiana, until then I keep supporting Rick.
Many people will look at it and say, because they are so very similar, why would we upset the apple cart, just to change colors? Just to change which palms are greased?
May as well let Obama do his thing...rather thatn someone having to start all over. Obama’s learning curve is over...Romney’s would just be beginning.
What a picture.......
Open convention..here we come...
Someone forgot to tell Louisiana.
That's the thing about those silly Cajun b*stards. They voted for Barry Goldwater in 1964 after LBJ's henches had told them Barry would tear up all their government checks. They voted for George C. Wallace in 1968 after LIFE magazine ran its famous "Wallace in the Flames of Hell" cover and accompanying story explaining how bad-awful-apocalyptic George Wallace was. And they voted for Dick Nixon in 1972 (how dare they!) and Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984. And they voted for Dubya! How backward and perverse can people be?
And now they've done it -- they voted for Rick Santorum, throwing their votes away just like they did in 1980 when they voted for Ronnie.
Can't anybody he'p these people to git thar mahnds raht?
< hurl >
Oh, he gets down and dirty all right - as long as its another Republican he can ruin. I seriously doubt he’ll go after obama the same way he has his fellow Republicans. McCain redux. Look how nasty McCain was against his opponent in AZ in 2010 - and what a light weight he was against obama.
McNasty is probably advising Mittens on how to destroy the conservatives in the race. I wouldn’t put it past the backstabbing, Dem-lite traitor.
Romney is so plastic. As you said, no fire in the belly. I wonder why he wants to be president - it sure isn’t because of the money. I wish I could believe its for the good of the country, but, I’m not sure of that either. Something just isn’t right about him.
We aren’t going to win with a moderate candidate. What part of this doesn’t the GOP-E understand? Why do they insist on strapping us with a DEM lite?
I disagree. There is little important difference between the 2 liberals Rombama and his friend Obamney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.