Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
From Fox News website:

ON – The Supreme Court has unanimously sided with Idaho property owners whose plans to build a home were blocked by an Environmental Protection Agency order declaring the property contained wetlands.

In an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court says Wednesday that the EPA cannot threaten fines of more than $30,000 a day without giving property owners the ability to challenge its actions.

The decision is a victory for Mike and Chantell Sackett, whose property near a scenic lake has sat undisturbed since the EPA ordered a halt in work in 2007. The agency said part of the property was a wetlands that cannot be disturbed without a permit.

The couple complained there was no reasonable way to challenge the order.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/21/supreme-court-sides-with-idaho-property-owners-over-epa/#ixzz1plUWfCxh

Thank you for the above information, Dr. Sivana (post #7)

Here's the SCOTUS opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1062.pdf

50 posted on 03/21/2012 8:50:08 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in Peace, and THANK YOU, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg
"The District Court dismissed the claims for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that the Clean Water Act precluded preenforcement judicial review of compliance orders and that such preclusion did not violate due process... SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court."

Wow. A unanimous SCOTUS triple smackdown of the District Court, the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals (they should be used to this by now!) and the EPA (they deserve a lot more smackdowns).

54 posted on 03/21/2012 8:56:47 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
UNANIMOUS.

Even the Marxists on the court flipped the EPA the bird.

THE EPA HAS NO REDEEMING FEATURES.

55 posted on 03/21/2012 8:57:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


57 posted on 03/21/2012 9:02:34 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
Yes, but as others pointed out, this merely allows them to fight the case in court, where it will end up with the Ninth Circus.

And I find it a little disturbing that a fine of just under $30,000 A DAY is acceptable to anyone.

67 posted on 03/21/2012 9:18:59 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
"In an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court says Wednesday that the EPA cannot threaten fines of more than $30,000 a day without giving property owners the ability to challenge its actions."

So....the EPA can still issue an edict in regard to my property and fine me $29,000 a day over an issue for noncompliance, AND I HAVE NO RIGHT TO APPEAL???? My only options are Obey or go bankrupt fast????

What happened to our country?????

76 posted on 03/21/2012 9:39:43 AM PDT by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Good news. Thanks for the ping.


78 posted on 03/21/2012 10:04:59 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Good news, thanks for the heads up!


82 posted on 03/21/2012 10:16:10 AM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

great news, made my day!


102 posted on 03/21/2012 5:26:59 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson