Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WFTR; All

Finally, Sarah Palin is not going to be on the ticket. In many ways, I like her, but she’s become damaged goods politically. She couldn’t deliver Alaska for Joe Miller in 2010 or Newt Gingrich a few weeks ago. To most Americans, she’s a joke. That perception is unfair, but crying that the perception is unfair won’t change the perception.
+++++++++++++++++++++++

Ahem, Joe didn’t win because Murkowski ran as an indie in the general and siphoned off just enough of the R’s (and perhaps a few D’s) to win. Murkowski is STILL a powerhouse name in Alaska politics with lots of GOP-e support and money. Joe was on a shoe-string budget and would of won if it was a traditional R-vs-D fight.

Palin is “damaged goods” to most Americans? Hmmmm....remember when they said that about Reagan and others in the past. I guess if your clientele are RINOS and liberal democrats, I guess so.

By the way, WTF-R, does it get tired reading the same old MSM talking points or have the zombie cells augmented your critical thinking areas?


36 posted on 03/18/2012 8:27:53 AM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: WFTR

AK267 is correct, the talking points on Palin are getting old and outdated.

WTF-R....LOL!!!! Spot on!


39 posted on 03/18/2012 8:34:10 AM PDT by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: ak267
You really come across as pathetic when you miss all of the points of my post and then attack my intelligence.

I know very well that Lisa Murkowski is an influential politician in Alaska and ran as an independent. My point was that Sarah Palin's influence in Alaska is weak. If her influence had been that strong, she could have swung those Republicans and independents to Joe Miller. If her influence were that strong, she could have swung the Alaska caucuses to Newt Gingrich. Instead, her candidate finished last by almost a double-digit margin.

As I said in a previous post to a more reasonable poster, Ronald Reagan had two successful terms as governor of California. Two full and successful terms as governor of our largest state means that he can sustain some hits without being damaged goods. An incomplete first term means that Sarah Palin doesn't have the same staying power. The characterizations of her may be inaccurate and unfair, but they stick to her more strongly than anything stuck to Ronald Reagan and they cannot be dismissed as easily.

By the way, I'm speaking from a rational perspective. You are the one deluded by irrational hatred. Maybe you need to get a tinfoil hat that is a size larger and get some more circulation to your brain.

52 posted on 03/18/2012 1:10:57 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: ak267

True about Sarah Palin. She is not popular among non conservatives. She will not be huge at the convention either, and she is now so deeply thrown in with newt that I don’t know what good she will do. The delegates are not all going to go for Gingrich. I am a huge Palin f an, but for some reason she has decided to pen herself in. And she won’t be on the ticket either.


75 posted on 03/19/2012 7:24:45 AM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson