Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw

If you think Limbaugh did not know what he was doing with his choice of words you are delusional.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Then why did he apologize? You seem to attack me every chance you get. Don’t know what I did to piss you off, but, we are on the same team.


38 posted on 03/08/2012 8:07:05 AM PST by no dems (No RINO-Rom, no Kook-Daddy and no "out of touch" Rev. Rick........Gingrich.... YES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: no dems

Stop being so sensitive.
You criticized Limbaugh, then state you don’t listen much.
I said he knew what he was doing, it was a non apology.
Have a good day at work - bye


41 posted on 03/08/2012 8:23:02 AM PST by svcw (Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
I think Rush apologized because he smelled a set up - a trap, could feel the snaps shutting tightly around his neck. I felt the same... When liberals ‘set us up’ they look for an ‘anita hill’ type. Wide eyed - someone the general public might deem as sweet - girl next door type... but with an edge. This was first a PR stunt - then a way to take down Rush - then a way to take down bloggers. Nothing the MSM would like more than to sue us into oblivion. They will definitely side with the 30 year old law student ... willfully and cheerfully presenting (to the general public) her as some recently virginal 23 year old ...)

The second reason he apologized is she might - might - not be a public person. I don't believe that - but it could be argued in a court of law - and we know how liberal judges and the Democrat-Media Complex work hand in glove...

If she had been a private citizen subpoenaed to testify - she would basically still be a private person - or semi-private but that wasn't the case. She was picked to speak as part of a PR stunt. This was NOT a true hearing. As such 'she held herself out to the public' to be judged or not - and that makes her a public person. Rush would NOT go after a private person - and either would bloggers. If she's a private citizen - we all need to apologize if we crossed the line.

To me, she went public voluntarily - held herself out for review - and was reviewed. If that's not the case, we need to be very careful - because she'll sue Rush and all of us while she's at it. And she'll have cranks come on our sites and set us up to say things that will be used against us.

These are NOT nice people - they're after money, power, and the joy of destroying the free speech of everyday citizens.

50 posted on 03/08/2012 8:50:14 AM PST by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex—buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
Thought I'd share this with you - the liberal Geraldo Rivera was on Fox and Friends this morning with the line about Rush Limbaugh being the spokesperson for the Republican party. It seems to be a liberal talking point. When he mouthed it, it became official. :) And you're right, we are on the same team. I came up with something a while back that was similar to what the liberal liars were pushing. It felt creepy - so I know what it's like. Happens.

I think dems are going to drop this issue - more is coming out about Ms Fluke and the people behind her....

79 posted on 03/09/2012 1:08:12 PM PST by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson