Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum camp asking conservatives to pressure Gingrich to drop out
MSNBC ^ | March 6, 2012 | Andrew Rafferty

Posted on 03/06/2012 9:18:04 PM PST by LonelyCon

Rick Santorum's campaign is calling on conservatives to pressure Newt Gingrich to abandon his bid for the White House, a senior adviser told reporters tonight.

Senior campaign strategist John Brabender said the key for the campaign going forward will be creating an opportunity to challenge Mitt Romney one-on-one, though Brabender maintained the Santorum campaign would not directly call on Gingrich to drop out of the race.

"We're never going to call on anybody to get out, but what we are calling is on Tea Party supporters and conservatives is to rally behind the only candidate that has demonstrated over and over again that he's the one who can compete against Mitt Romney," Brabender said.

"The real key right now is, can we get an opportunity to get a one-on-one shot with Mitt Romney," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adiosnewt; election; getoutnewt; gingrich; goawaynewt; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newt4romney; newtbots4romney; newtbotsindenial; newtgetout; newtgingrich; newtistoast; newtsplittingthevote; ricksantorum; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-255 next last
To: LonelyCon

He ought to join with Newt and ask Mittens to get lost.


161 posted on 03/07/2012 4:55:54 AM PST by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Can’t go with it.


162 posted on 03/07/2012 5:01:05 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

Destroying the opposition in debates is not the goal. Nobody watches them but us. Winning the votes of the uninformed american electorate is. . . they happen to be the majority.

Newt and Rick couldn’t be more polarizing to the masses of uninformed on the other side of the aisle, who get their news from the old media. Wish it wasn’t so, but it is.


163 posted on 03/07/2012 5:02:28 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Gee Wally

“Santorum stabbed the conservatives in the back and endorsed Specter.”

Yep, he’d make a mighty fine POTUS. Just the type the GOP elite yearn for.


164 posted on 03/07/2012 5:04:18 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

There’s a significant group of who wouldn’t even vote if Gingrich dropped out.


165 posted on 03/07/2012 5:06:10 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

MSNBC once again creates a narrative that isn’t held up by reading the article.

Nobody called on Newt to drop out. LOL


166 posted on 03/07/2012 5:09:07 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

MSNBC once again creates a narrative that isn’t held up by reading the article.

Nobody called on Newt to drop out. LOL


167 posted on 03/07/2012 5:12:08 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; Cato in PA; napscoordinator; Lazlo in PA; Antoninus; writer33; CharlesWayneCT
156 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:38:33 AM by cripplecreek: “Its no secret that I don’t like Gingrich but I do think he would be nearly ideal for a VP pick. He’s strong willed enough that he would have considerable influence in a Santorum administration and he has experience in herding the cats in congress.”

I think I agree. Vice-presidents in modern times have rarely presided over the Senate, but I've said before that having Gingrich as president of the Senate could be a very interesting scenario. One thing nobody doubts is that Gingrich effectively blew apart the go-along-to-get-along climate of the House of Representatives and maybe he could also do that to the Senate.

160 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:52:05 AM by Cato in PA: “It’s a simple matter of voting for the most competitive conservative in your given state. I caught hell from the Newt supporters last night for saying this, but it cuts both ways. If you know that Newt is NOT going to win, then don’t be stupid and vote for him anyway. If you know Santorum is NOT going to win, then don’t be stupid and vote for him anyway. We here need to do our due diligence and prove that we’re smart enough - and mature enough - to put defeating Barack Obama from Massachusetts as our #1 goal. We found out just recently that he lobbied Obama for Romneycare on a national level. Neither Rick nor Newt is even close to being that bad. If Newt isn’t competitive in any of the remaining states, then yes, he should drop out, but I find that scenario hard to believe. I think it’s more likely that he and Santorum will each be popular in a few.”

I agree with you on this. Neither Gingrich nor Santorum are the enemy. Romney is, followed by Obama.

168 posted on 03/07/2012 5:28:00 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Bobbisox

I admire your high level of enthusiasm, but Newt was 1-9 yesterday. If he doesn`t catch fire RIGHT NOW and run the table through the rest of the south and get lucky nearly everywhere else, it just simply isn`t going to happen for him.

Like it or hate it, as things stand now, Santorum — with all his warts — is the only barrier left to Romney going forward.


169 posted on 03/07/2012 5:29:28 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Rick is known to “take one for the team” He will compromise his convictions in a heartbeat.
We know what Romney is but RS is a rino in conservative suits.


170 posted on 03/07/2012 5:32:55 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Because Newt is the ONLY real conservative


171 posted on 03/07/2012 5:35:07 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Exactly! From his own mouth, takes one for the team. And we see what team he is on - and it's NOT conservative/AMERICA'S team.

He is stringed up with the GOP E and whatever they want, they pull him in that direction. He stands for nothing other than to be 'used' for their agenda. Lying lawyer that he is.

172 posted on 03/07/2012 5:40:47 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
He will compromise his convictions in a heartbeat.

He already did in '08 when he campaigned/supported with the ONLY pro abortion and against traditional marriage, pro homo candidate. That's the real rick - he stands for nothing but 'his' gain.

Now suddenly he's standing for it today. He'll drop it for his gain anytime. He's a political whore liar.

173 posted on 03/07/2012 5:50:53 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina; SatinDoll

darrell, the thread that SatinDoll was referencing in post 83 was pulled on Feb. 11 by Jim Robinson - Reason? - Trash.


174 posted on 03/07/2012 6:03:50 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: dforest
"MSNBC once again creates a narrative that isn’t held up by reading the article.

Nobody called on Newt to drop out. LOL"

Glad someone finally pointed that out, dforest. It does not surprise me though with all the Santorum bashing that exists on FR threads lately.
175 posted on 03/07/2012 6:09:24 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
If Gingrich were to drop out, Santorum would welt within a week under the fire of Romney's negative campaigning.

Maybe Santorum is smart enough to know this, and maybe this is what he is working toward. Santorum's voters are not smart enough to even fathom this electoral game; and that's why Santorum is tailoring his message for this bloc of voters. Same as Huckabee in 2008.

Newt gave him a chance to take Michigan, and he blew it, perhaps deliberately.

Santorum had a chance to take Ohio, and he blew it, perhaps deliberately.

Maybe Santorum knew the game being planned in Virginia, and didn't bother to get on that ballot.

As it stands now, Newt is looking like the only sincere non-Romney candidate.

176 posted on 03/07/2012 6:17:33 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Here’s what I posted elsewhere. Maybe somebody could suggest this to both the Santorum and Gingrich camps:

I’d feel a heckuva lot better voting for either Gingrich or Santorum rather than Mitt though. Mitt was the FIRST one to force religious institutions to commit what they believe to be murder. There’s no way I can support somebody who does that. And no way I can support the R establishment after the shenanigans they’ve done.

Gingrich and Santorum are both Catholics. How about they let God decide? How about they draw straws to see which will be the Pres and which will be the VP, and then go with whatever the Lord says? In the Old Testament times God’s people listened to the LORD by using the urim and thummin. Scripture says the LORD determines the cast of every die. If these guys are really trusting in the LORD they will be glad to take His answer and serve in whatever way HE ALONE says.

Somebody has to do something now. I haven’t followed every nook and cranny of the race but I don’t think those 2 guys have burned any bridges with each other, and if they united in this way I think it would mean a lot to both camps and would say that they are SERIOUSLY serving the Lord and this country rather than their own ego.

I say let the LORD decide which is top on the ticket, and let them both make it clear what they did to resolve the issue. Before either one burns brdges that we need intact.


177 posted on 03/07/2012 6:19:00 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

It’s Santorum who should do the dropping out.


178 posted on 03/07/2012 6:22:52 AM PST by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I don’t think too many took the time to read it. The knee jerk reaction is so much more fun and opens the door to more bashing.

Lately, I look at the source, when I see it is questionable, I make sure I read the whole thing. The left loves to keep stirring the pot in order to keep conservatives all split up.

LOL


179 posted on 03/07/2012 6:26:12 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Gee, I remember not so long ago that all we heard was how vital South Carolina was to the republican primaries. No candidate has gone on to win the nomination without taking SC, blah blah blah. Gingrich is still in the hunt. Those I talk to and on FR, viscerally dislike the whining, Rick Santorum, so who is to say that if Newt dropped, Mr. Oral Moral would automatically get the votes?


180 posted on 03/07/2012 6:28:08 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson