Replies

Oh. The famous liberal fall back position. It’s for the children!!!!!

For this same reason a school official can search through a child’s lunch box, or Michele Obama can dictate carrots and push-ups and a bureaucrat forces someone to buy insurance.....

As long as you say its for the children everything is ok.

“Maybe we can just pretend that the ultrasound is the DUE PROCESS “ You have to do a whole lot of pretending to turn this into small government conservatism. Liberals demand that we pay to provided free care, including prenatal care and we, with good reason, object.

You demand that this sort of care be forced on a woman without her consent and you want to call it conservative- no conservatism I’ve ever heard of.

Perhaps the problem comes from your not having a very good handle on the US Constitution. TO begin with “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

I think you are on the wrong site newbie. This a 100% PRO LIFE, PRO GOD website.

The last time I looked, the children didn’t have a fundamental right to chicken nuggets for lunch but they DO have a fundamental GOD-given right to LIFE. And it is the role of government to secure that right for them although at present the government is not only irresponsible, it is complicit.

The right of life is the most fundamental of all rights. Without life, you have no other rights.

You are correct in one thing. It does take a whole lot of pretending to even consider an ultrasound meeting the demand of due process before an individual life can be taken.

In fact, the ONLY argument that can be made for an abortion is if the pregnancy is threatening the life of the mother, iow if the baby is infringing upon the mother’s right to life.

In my haste I made a mistake. I did post that the rights were outlined in the Constitution instead of the Declaration of Independence. I know what our founding documents say and have studied them intently. I am restudying them right now with my children.
But your ad hominen attack is duly noted. Are you denying the fact that we have a fundamental right to life in this country?

So your position on the issue is that the fundamental right of a child to live is trumped by the women’s ‘right’ to not be inconvienced with a simple ultrasound?

You are definitely on the wrong site!

“You demand that this sort of care be forced on a woman without her consent and you want to call it conservative-”

What is conservative - and honorable and right - is to defend the life of those that cannot defend themselves.

You may be in the wrong place.

“Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the Declaration of Independence...” Which led to our Constitution.

Again - You may be in the wrong place.