So allowing a woman to have the most information about what is going to happen to her during a medical procedure is “rape”? For people who believe in “choice”, they sure don’t think that an informed choice is a good one.
"So allowing a woman to have the most information about what is going to happen to her during a medical procedure is “rape”? For people who believe in “choice”, they sure don’t think that an informed choice is a good one."
Yep. Not to mention that they pride themselves on supposedly being the "Party of Science"...
Behar, in an almost unique instance of honesty out of a leftist, stated the honest reason that they are outraged by this requirement -
it’s making someone face something they’ve already decided they don’t want to have to deal with.
Left unstated was the “issue” that they don’t want to deal with - the humanity of the “fetus” and the subsequent acknowledgement that terminating it is murder.
They prefer Ignorant Choice.
It goes along with the Lump of Cells description of a Human Life.
If Abortionists did the same things that they do to a Human Fetus during an Abortion to a Golden Retriever Fetus, there would be a PETA March on Washington.