Posted on 02/13/2012 3:23:47 AM PST by veritas2002
Obama vs. Our Obsolete Constitution
Ive gotten some very interesting emails regarding President Obamas mandate commanding Roman Catholics (and many evangelical Protestants) to violate their consciences by providing mandatory contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing pharmaceuticals. The emailers noted that Obamas action will force Catholics to challenge the president in court, particularly given that bishops are saying they will not comply with the law. It could mean another constitutional showdown over Obama-care, one that could likewise end up in the Supreme Court. Imagine: The Catholic Bishops v. Obama.
What a fitting capstone to the Obama presidency. And imagine that a majority of professing Roman Catholics elected this man in November 2008.
If this issue goes to the high court, I wouldnt bet my money on Obama, even with the two new pro-choice, pro-Roe liberals he added to the bench: Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. Even the most progressive Supreme Court justice cannot avoid that old freedom-of-religion thing in the First Amendment.
All of that is remarkable enough. But I find it especially ironic given two other fascinating current news item relating to the Constitution:
Last week, President Obama did an interview with NBCs Matt Lauer. Obama expressed frustration at his inability to be the transformational political figure Americans elected. The change agent lamented that this was the fault of the American Founderswho Obama refers to as men of property and wealthand their Constitution. Obama told Lauer:
Whats frustrated people is that I have not been able to force Congress to implement every aspect of what I said in 2008. Well, it turns out our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change that I would like sometimes. But what I have been able to do is move in the right direction. And what Im going to keep on doing is plot away, very persistent.
Obama is quite correct. His primary obstacle is the Founders system of separation of powers and checks and balances. His problem is a Congress and Supreme Court that is empowered to say, No, Mr. President, that isnt constitutional. You cant do that in America.
Well, Obamas mandate to the Catholic Church could be the next such challenge, again impeding his self-perceived rise to transcendent political greatness. A Democrat-controlled Congress approved Obama-care, but the Supreme Court now must scrutinize its provisions. Thats the courts duty.
That brings me to the second news item: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave an interview to Egyptian television. Ginsburg will likely be the next justice to step down. Once Obama replaces her with a much younger pro-Roe judge, this nation will have Roe v. Wade for another 39 years. In the interview, Ginsburg advised Middle East democrats on drafting a constitution. She did not, however, recommend the U.S. Constitution. Ginsburg stated:
I cant speak about what the Egyptian experience should be, because Im operating under a rather old constitution. The United States, in comparison to Egypt, is a very new nation; and yet we have the oldest written constitution still in force in the world . I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, and had an independent judiciary It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recently than the U.S. Constitution, Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world?
Actually, why not take advantage of whats in the U.S. Constitution? The paradox in Ginsburgs statement is her dismissal of the U.S. Constitution because its rather old; in fact, the oldest written constitution still in force in the world.
Well, why is it so old and still in force? Because it was done right. It is based on timeless values and virtues and universal rights that work; that are true. It has been amended less than 30 times in 220-some years. It is the most stable, successful, remarkable constitution in history, bringing together a vast array of peoples and assimilating them into historys most prosperous, awe-inspiring nationa nation that spent the 20th century winning freedom for other nations, so those nations could produce democracies and constitutions.
The U.S. Constitution is the perfect model, at once both beautifully broad and specific. And among the things it got right are separation of powers and checks in balances. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and President Obama may be learning that again very sooncompliments of Obama-care and its constitutional assault on the consciences of religious believers.
“Is there any doubt that this man lied when he swore to defend the Constitution?”
Is there any doubt that he lies every time he opens his mouth? (Well, 95% of the time at least.)
Which gives rise to my personal Obama policy, which I recommend to encourage clearer thinking re. “The Won”:
“Don’t listen to what he says, watch what he does. ALL that he does.”
Watch for Obummer to dissolve the monasteries and divvy the spoils among his supporters.
That is a myth.
Actually he had the schedules reprinted to show the time the trains actually ran, so they were "on time".
> That is a myth.
Too bad my dad is gone, now.
You would have to dispute that with him.
He grew up in Mussolini’s Italy.
“I can find no support for Mussolini ACTUALLY making the trains run on time, it seems to be a myth. I certainly have not been able to find any confirmation for his having train crews shot for late arrival. I suppose I must be looking in all the wrong places.”
You’re correct. The probable reason they were shot was because they were southern Communists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.