Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Track9
"Russ, you ignorant slut"... Yes, maybe Iran COULD shut down the Strait for a few days... now tell me how they deal with the aftermath. Multiple carrier groups coming into the region, the US ramping up tank divisions in Iraq, waves of bombers coming in from multiple directions, large percentages of younger Iranians who want democratic changes helping out US Special Forces teams, etc etc etc.

But yes, they can crow about closing an important waterway for a few days... as long as they don't mind the massive consequences, the regime change, and the reputation for bringing back the US Armed Forces into the region.

2 posted on 02/12/2012 6:57:14 AM PST by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317

Assume the US knows where the missiles are.


4 posted on 02/12/2012 6:59:35 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317

That was about my reaction. Not likely Iranian threats would last to long.


5 posted on 02/12/2012 7:02:28 AM PST by Track9 ("Strength through peace.. oh wait, I mean" Mit Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317
But yes, they can crow about closing an important waterway for a few days...

Keep in mind we have the "negotiator" in chief who very well could try and talk them into opening it up again.

THAT could take a few years....

6 posted on 02/12/2012 7:08:46 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317
"Russ, you ignorant slut"...

No kidding. First, there's no indication that these things are land-based (like Silkworms are). They're either ship/sub-launched, or air-launched.

So they need to get the shooting platforms into range of our CSGs. Not going to happen.

Back in the 1980s PBS did a really great NOVA episode called "The Battle for the Norwegian Sea". Basically a hit piece on the Reagan buildup and the emphasis on big-deck carriers. They interviewed John Lehman, then SecNav, and he pretty much destroyed the critics by pointing out that all their analyses were based on the assumption that the USN was going to try to sail it's carriers "up the Volga River" on the first day of a war.

Putting carriers into the Persian Gulf, or sailing them through the Straits of Taiwan are nice show-the-flag publicity moves, and in cases where we KNOW we own the pond (like Desert Storm and Iraqi freedom) prove useful for combat by shortening mission times/durations. But in a shooting war with either Iran or the ChiComs we're going to hold them back a ways and use them to reach out and touch the enemy from distance. Significant distance.
7 posted on 02/12/2012 7:10:39 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317

After Bandar Shapur and Qom are ashes will the missiles continue to guard the straight?


12 posted on 02/12/2012 7:27:15 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317

Why do you think Iraq will let us bring in tank divisions to fight Iran?


19 posted on 02/12/2012 7:45:51 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson