Funny how they did so without using the word "Kind," huh? And funny how they did so using a phrase ("natural born citizen") that sounds oddly reminiscent of a phrase ("natural born subject") that (a) would have been recognizable to anyone in the former colonies and (b) had nothing to do with ethnicity or "Kind."
It's one thing to argue that Obama is ineligible because his father was not a citizen. It's another thing to argue that Obama is ineligible because his father is black (and that all blacks, southern Europeans, Jews, etc. are ineligible to be President). The former is a reasonable argument, based on solid (if not universal) principles of international law. The latter makes you look like you belong on Stormfront, not FR.
Wanted to let you know your Alinsky methods do not work.
Say hello to the crazy Foggy.
If I wanted to formulate an argument that was as discrediting to the “birther” movement as it was possible to be - arguing that only white people of Anglo-Saxon descent are natural born citizens would pretty much hit the nail on the head.
Notice how the usual suspects circle the wagons around him?
Lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas.