Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196

You are absolutely stark raving nuts if you think that a person in one case has to challenge the stipulations from a DIFFERENT CASE in order to not have somebody else’s stipulation wander over into their case.

That is absolutely asinine. The cases were totally separate.

And nobody can stipulate anybody into being legally eligible. It can’t be done. I can’t stipulate a purple person’s skin into being orange either. And I can’t stipulate MTV into a 5 million dollar contract that they never agreed to - even if in another court case they failed to refute my stipulation. This is absolutely crazy, what you’re saying.

It is a total waste of time to even discuss this with you.

A judge can’t “offer” to make a candidate either eligible or not eligible. And a plaintiff can’t refuse an “offer” of the candidate being eligible or not. The candidate either is, or isn’t. And Obama has produced ABSOLUTELY NO PROBATIVE EVIDENCE THAT HE IS ELIGIBLE. Nothing that happened in Georgia the day of the hearing up until now CAN change that fact.

Has Obama proven he is eligible, or not? If so, what probative evidence did he present to prove his eligibility?Just answer those questions. Those are the only questions that Malihi had to answer.

Did Obama prove his eligibility in the Taitz case? If so, with what legally probative records?

Did Obama prove his eligibility in the Irion case? If so, with what legally probative records?

Did Obama prove his eligibility in the Hatfield case? If so, with what legally probative records?

I’m going to do my best to just ignore anything from you that doesn’t address those questions because they are the crux of this whole thing.


64 posted on 02/08/2012 8:05:34 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

It has been explained to you by several people - you just refuse to accept the answer. Read the judge’s statement for understanding this time.


82 posted on 02/09/2012 4:05:07 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

The judge was prepared to give the plaintiffs everything they wanted - EVERYTHING. Explain that to me if you can. Did he use a Jedi mind trick to compel them to make the wrong choice?

They had victory in their hands and threw it away. You cannot blame the judge for that.


100 posted on 02/09/2012 1:45:17 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson