You don’t get it. Obama lost - the judge offered a default judgment. The plaintiffs rejected it.
How does anything the plaintiffs did or didn’t do change whether Obama has qualified for the position he seeks? Either he’s qualified or he isn’t. No lawyer or judge can bargain away the people’s right to have a candidate who is actually eligible for the job. That right of the people is firmly anchored in Georgia’s statute and can’t be nullified by tricksy lawyerly garbage.
Obama has presented ZERO legal evidence of being qualified for the job. There is no way a judge can legally say he is qualified UNLESS THAT DECISION IS BASED ON “JUDGE’S KNOWLEDGE” - a decision based on something besides actual probative evidence.