The post didn't support that “line of reasoning” if you can attempt to call such racist antihistoric drivel reasoning, but I didn't say it did.
This stuff is posted frequently. The poster is a birther in good standing.
He certainly has not been called out on it or cast out of the birther ranks.
Thus my accurate characterization that rather than being condemned ‘the wagons were circled’.
Do you have any evidence of ANY said suspects doing ANYTHING to condemn that “line of reasoning”?
I'll wait.
I did question it.
"I’m of the firm opinion that Natural Born Citizen means a person born of two parents who are themselves also citizens (of whatever kind), and I must admit that I don’t see this “Anglo Saxon” thing. Am I missing something, here? Perhaps it wasn't vehement enough for you, but since I'm relatively (less than a year) new to the forum and wasn't sure that I was interpreting what I was reading correctly I simply said "I don't see this 'Anglo Saxon' thing. Am I missing something, here?" thereby allowing the poster an opportunity to clarify or walk back their remarks.
Post #56 has been removed, so I was only able to backtrack through the conversation that far, but what I did read seems to merely have consisted of arguments about the Founders intending that aspirants for the presidency be of a "Kind" (citizen offspring of citizens, most of whom at that time were in fact white folks of European descent), rather than Consience of a Conservative's and your apparent conclusion that bushpilot1 was expressing an opinion that only whites should be able to aspire to the presidency. I think that accusations of racism have been ijected into this conversation where they are not necessarily warranted.
Clearer?