You statement is proof you cannot understand the damn decision. In the law, you do not ask the question unless you can live with the answer. All you got was a decision confirming anchor babies.
See, see, judges in Ga. can aid and abet treason with the rest of em.
And only an IDIOT would conclude that "anchor babies" are a reasonable interpretation of the 14th amendment, yet that is what passes for law these days.
What Whodat? You are truly naive. The administrative judge just assisted the plaintiffs in their goal...
Atty. Van Irion to Appeal Judge Malihi’s Decision: Court Ignored Basic Rules of Interpretation
“The one point of good news from this ruling is that we have FINALLY gotten a court to rule on the merits of our argument. This may seem like a hollow victory, but it isn’t. Before this everyone that has brought a challenge against Obama’s eligibility has been dismissed on procedural grounds. Nothing is more devastating to the rule of law than a judicial branch that refuses to do its job. Before this case we had courts across the country telling Americans that they had no right to enforce the Constitution. That was absurdity at its most extreme. Liberty Legal Foundation found a case that we believed would at least get a ruling on the merits. We hate the ruling we got, but at least we got a ruling. Now we can appeal that ruling. The appeals process now will focus on the definition of “natural born citizen” rather than procedure for the first time since the issue of Obama’s eligibility was raise in 2008.”
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/attorney-van-irion-to-appeal-judge.html