Replies

You could not be more wrong.
I am worried that this entire thing, all of your efforts, will backfire.
Obama is vulnerable on his hidden past, his college records, his former writings (where are they, where is that Harvard Law Review record?)
Obama is vulnerable on MANY fronts.
However? Obama will use YOU and your birther buddies as a “straw man” and avoid answering any of the other, more important questions due to the PR disaster that will eventually come to conservatives, from this dubious misuse of our resources.

I am absolutely right on the law, and my take on the law will prevail, in the end.

I wish we could invalidate Obama this way, but I honestly, sincerely doubt that we can.

Also, I came to my decision on my own -— but I am comfortable with my decision as I see that NOBODY of any real note is on your side, on this one.

I will actually be pleasantly surprised if I am wrong, but one “outlier” lower State Court case will prove nothing.

“.........this dubious misuse of our resources....”

I do believe you're letting your mask slip a little to reveal somewhat of a collectivist mind. “OUR resources”?? Anything I contribute to is done solely using MY money that I've worked hard to earn.

And if you turn out to be “pleasantly surprised” (as you put it) you state that it would merely be “...one ‘outlier’ lower State Court case (which) will prove nothing.” On the contrary, it will represent 100% of the judicial decisions on the Obama ballot eligibility issue. 100% is certainly not an “outlier”; it would seem to be more like a precedent.

Again, you're not discouraging anyone here if that's your intent. You're amusing many of us and irritating others. And maybe helping to motivate us all.