“The SS number assigned to Barack Obama is from a man born in 1890. It was issued in Connecticut to Obama in 1977”
The implication of the testimony is that the number was “issued” to the man born in 1890 not Obama.
That means Obama stole it at some point. Not necessarily in 1977.
You raise an EXCELLENT detailed discrepancy point that is like the many I’ve noted during the entire “Who is OB?” investigation.
(1) The SSA# being used by OB seems to have been associated with a gent born in 1890, but who never worked or used it.
(2) Sometime in the mid 70s, this number somehow became associated with OB.
(3) The claim that it was issued to “someone” in CT at a time that OB was nowhere nearby is what sheds suspicion onto the legitimacy of OB using this particular SSA#.
(4) If indeed, the original application for this SSA#, (which OB is fighting tooth and nail to suppress), shows that ANYONE other than OB applied for it, the game is over.
(5) Don’t expect them to release that application willingly (ie w/o involving the SCOTUS).
I think the clincher is, as I undetstand it, that this person died IN HAWAII ! — and Grandma most likely had his SS# transferred to her grandson....a CRIME worth investigating ! I read Orly’s messages regarding Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse earlier - I dontaed to his case and after reading Orly’s comments, I am quite dismayed that this sheriff chose to do NOTHING at this crucial hearing. Here is the guy that purposedly said “show me the micro-fiche ! “ and now he (like Trump) is lying down like a dead duck on this outrageous BC fraud ! What gives ?????? P.S. Mr. Wright - I like your “Whitey House” line !