Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Newt pleaded nolo contendere in that debate, let Romney’s mud go unanswered. It was a mistake to try to brush it all off with a link to newt.org. He had the floor, had a nationally televised debate’s audience, and should have addressed it then and there.


4 posted on 01/26/2012 7:01:14 AM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Lucky

yes, I wanted him to address it then & there even IF it took up time back & forth. many people watching would be too lazy to go to newt.org in the morning. they needed it spoon fed to them right then, right there.


11 posted on 01/26/2012 7:06:55 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Lady Lucky

Yep he’s made that mistake twice now. Once in Iowa and then again in Florida. Him losing the polls is a good thing because that’s when he does his best.


67 posted on 01/26/2012 7:47:09 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Lady Lucky

The problem was that Romney made 10 assaults in 60 seconds, and Newt had 30 seconds to answer. Ridiculous. The format should allow Newt to reasonably address accusations.


113 posted on 01/26/2012 9:15:21 AM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson