Skip to comments.
Filmmaker Oliver Stone would vote for Ron Paul over Obama
thehill.com ^
| 1-24-12
| Jonathan Easley
Posted on 01/24/2012 11:18:09 AM PST by Justaham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Justaham
Just think what a Gingrich/Paul ticket would be like?
21
posted on
01/24/2012 11:52:16 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: Justaham
Just think what a Gingrich/Paul ticket would be like?
22
posted on
01/24/2012 11:52:34 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: nuconvert
kooks of a feather.....But I'm still surprised.
23
posted on
01/24/2012 12:05:57 PM PST
by
bgill
(The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
To: Justaham
Maybe they can team up with OJ to find the real killers.
To: stuartcr
Just think what a Gingrich/Paul ticket would be like? It would consist of one very brainy, rational, authentic Conservative who realizes that freedom and liberty are built upon a foundation of unsurpassed military might. Our enemies must be in mortal fear of a powerful, no-compromise, no-quarter-given, ruthless America.
And on the other hand, such an absurd ticket would be "balanced" by a lunatic who favors application of the Golden Rule as a means to deal with evildoers.
Go Newt Go! Restore a confident, strong America!
Go Paul...just go away...far, far away.
25
posted on
01/24/2012 12:09:18 PM PST
by
re_nortex
(DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
To: re_nortex
26
posted on
01/24/2012 12:54:26 PM PST
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: Justaham
He says this because he knows Paul won’t win the nomination
27
posted on
01/24/2012 12:56:19 PM PST
by
lowbridge
(Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
To: Da Coyote
And the importance of a liberal directors statements are? Exactly. I have not seen one statement on this thread that is not a simple argumentum ad hominem.
28
posted on
01/24/2012 2:01:32 PM PST
by
Lysander
(Don't stand where I told you to stand. Stand where I told you to stand.)
To: Justaham
Seems like some lefties are figuring it out that when the economy goes south they are going with it
29
posted on
01/24/2012 2:13:10 PM PST
by
uncbob
To: formosa
Thats one more reason not to vote for Ron Paul. Stone is the creepiest commie cuddler in Hollywood. By your logic this babe would be enough reason to vote for Paul.
30
posted on
01/24/2012 2:13:10 PM PST
by
Lysander
(Don't stand where I told you to stand. Stand where I told you to stand.)
To: Justaham
Bad news for Ron Paul.
Kinda like it was bad news for Fredo when Michael gave him a kiss.
To: Justaham
“Because hes the only one of anybody whos saying anything intelligent about the future of the world.”
Kindred spirits.
32
posted on
01/24/2012 2:54:44 PM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(Diplomacy is war by other means.)
To: All
Why can’t paul get any traction...? /s
33
posted on
01/24/2012 3:00:51 PM PST
by
Leep
(It's gonna be a Newt day!)
To: Justaham
Next up to back the Paulistinian: Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Jane Fonda, et al.
34
posted on
01/24/2012 4:56:53 PM PST
by
BlackElk
( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
To: bigdirty
Voting for Obama and then for Paul does not evidence schizophrenia. It just means that Stone doesn't care one way or another about the government's level of spending, high or low, or gold standards, or socialism as such vs, capitalism as such.
What Obozo and the Paulistinian share is a desire to destroy our nation, our military, our defenses, our foreign policy, cuddle our enemies, betray our friends, preserve abortion and promote homosexuality, inter alia. They have plenty of issues in common. Everyone is not obsessed with money, money, money.
35
posted on
01/24/2012 5:07:26 PM PST
by
BlackElk
( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
To: bigdirty
AND Stone is a crackpot just like Ron Paul.
36
posted on
01/24/2012 5:09:39 PM PST
by
BlackElk
( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
To: Justaham
Obama is just too conservative and not anti-America enough for Oliver Stone.
37
posted on
01/24/2012 5:28:24 PM PST
by
John D
To: John D
unbelieveable comments.
my respect for fellow “Free Republic”ans, has suddenly dropped through the floor. Romney and Gingrich are both globalists. Period. Socialist lights.
Paul is and has been a Constitutionalist. as in, the U.S. Constitution. sort of like the way George Washington was. that guy that strongly URGED the nation to stay out of foreign wars. but what the hell did he know, right?
and because we have allowed the globalists/ Federal Reserve to rule us for the last 100 years (read Rothschild...), we are now BROKE. so we are borrowing against our children’s children’s future to pay for “Foreign Aid”. stupid is about to become TOO painful for words...
and don’t forget it was the GLOBALISTS Bush/Clinton that sent all our manufacturing overseas. NAFTA. GATT. and all the Congress went along for the ride.
well those roosters have come home to roost. and you goobers haven’t figured out why.
38
posted on
01/24/2012 7:37:27 PM PST
by
jed turtle
(Trust in the Lord and acknowledge Him in all your ways)
To: Justaham
BUT, would he vote for Ron Paul over Hugo Chavez?
39
posted on
01/24/2012 8:09:58 PM PST
by
Tribune7
(GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
To: jed turtle
Paul is and has been a Constitutionalist. as in, the U.S. Constitution. Paul is and has been a Constitutionalist sort of like the way George Washington was.I>
The Constitution is a total document. The surrender monkey takes the parts that he likes and says they are constitutional. Parts he does not like he says are unconstitutional.
sort of like the way George Washington was.
George Washington did not blame America for keeping us free and safe. Since when did George Washington want perverts in the military?
40
posted on
01/25/2012 3:01:11 AM PST
by
John D
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson