Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore backs Obama on Keystone rejection
The Hill ^

Posted on 01/24/2012 8:43:37 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Gore backs Obama on Keystone rejection By Ben Geman - 01/24/12 10:49 AM ET

Al Gore says President Obama made the right call when he denied a permit for the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline.

The former vice president, on his blog Monday evening, lauded environmentalists who battled TransCanada Corp.’s project to bring oil sands crude from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries.

“This is an important win not only for the thousands of activists who risked arrest — and for the hundreds who went to jail — but for all of us who want to try and roll back the effects of the climate crisis, not magnify them,” Gore said.

Environmentalists opposed the project due to greenhouse gas emissions and other ecological damage from Alberta’s oil sands projects, fear of spills along the pipeline route and other factors.

Obama, however, said on Jan. 18 that he was not rejecting the project on the merits but rather because Republicans placed what he called an arbitrary decision timeline in December’s payroll tax cut extension measure.

The State Department, which headed the federal review of Keystone XL, has invited TransCanada to reapply, and the company intends to do so. Gore, in his post, says opponents need to be ready.

He writes:

Many have noted the continuing risk that advocates of the pipeline will come back with a modified proposal backed by lobbying and campaign contributions — and that following the election this fall this issue may yet resurface in the first part of 2013. As a result opponents of the Keystone pipeline must remain engaged and prepared to beat this proposal again when and if it resurfaces.

Republicans and business groups have hammered Obama over the rejection, calling it a missed chance to boost U.S. energy security and create jobs.

But Gore claims it’s a “myth” that the project would help the country, and highlighted last week’s State Department report to Congress about the project as evidence.

State, citing its own earlier environmental impact statement, told Congress: “The analysis from the final EIS ... indicates that denying the permit at this time is unlikely to have a substantial impact on U.S. employment, economic activity, trade, energy security or foreign policy over the longer term.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Nut.....
1 posted on 01/24/2012 8:43:39 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
That's a load off my mind. I was really sweating Al's position on this.
2 posted on 01/24/2012 8:47:48 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yawn. Gore supports a Democrat and is anti-petroleum.

Can’t be news.


3 posted on 01/24/2012 8:48:17 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama's War on Prosperity is killing me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

4 posted on 01/24/2012 8:48:55 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gore is just one of those has-beens desperate to become relevant again. He’ll do anything to get a toe back under the spotlight. I’ll just add him to the list with...

Cindy Sheehan
Madonna
Michael Moore
Bill Clinton
Jimmy Carter
Al Sharpton
Jesse Jackson

Some people just never figure out the 15 minute thing.


5 posted on 01/24/2012 8:49:38 AM PST by Tigerized (Occupy Wall Street? Go find the real culprits in the Capitol Building...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He must have stock in BNSF as well.


6 posted on 01/24/2012 8:50:18 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, of COURSE he does... Gore is another looney enviroweenie :p


7 posted on 01/24/2012 8:50:26 AM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gore claims it’s a “myth” that the project would help the country ...

Rejecting the project does help some countries -- Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc.

8 posted on 01/24/2012 8:50:35 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
And to think this guy was 1000 votes in Florida or 17 in the Senate away from the Presidency... yikes!
9 posted on 01/24/2012 8:51:11 AM PST by jpf (phillies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

My theory is that every time Bore speaks out for OB, OB loses 50,000 votes. Keep it comin!


10 posted on 01/24/2012 8:53:21 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gore backs Obama on Keystone rejection

Just in case we required further verification that this was the wrong decision...

11 posted on 01/24/2012 8:53:55 AM PST by Prov1322 (Enjoy my wife's incredible artwork at www.watercolorARTwork.com! (This space no longer for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

...necessarily...


12 posted on 01/24/2012 8:57:37 AM PST by petro45acp (NO good endeavour survives an excess of "adult supervision" (hence the American experiment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“This is an important win ... for all of us who want to try and roll back the effects of the climate crisis, not magnify them,” Gore said. Environmentalists opposed the project due to greenhouse gas emissions and other ecological damage from Alberta’s oil sands projects, fear of spills along the pipeline route and other factors.

Obama and Gore may both be Nobel Prize winners, but they are morons (sad how often those two traits go together). This oil will be pulled out of the ground, and it will be burned. The question, even if you accept global warming, is whether we want it used in the United States or in China. This oil will still be transported. The real question is whether we will transport it by pipeline, which has the lowest ecological impact of any transportation system, or by supertanker. With Obama's politicized decision, Canada will send that oil across the Pacific to China, while the Middle East will send other oil across the oceans to us. In other words, everyone loses - the classic liberal "solution" to any problem.

13 posted on 01/24/2012 8:59:14 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Gore got money from Buffett as well. The Buff-man makes money keeping the pipeline out.


14 posted on 01/24/2012 8:59:26 AM PST by edcoil (It is not over until I win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gore?... who the hell is Gore?


15 posted on 01/24/2012 8:59:55 AM PST by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gosh. You would think that Algore would want the pipeline to provide more fuel for his massive houseboat.


16 posted on 01/24/2012 9:01:13 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver


17 posted on 01/24/2012 9:02:10 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What’s the matter, Al?

Can’t find any massage therapists to ‘take care of this’ so you have to stick your morbidly obese self into something that no one really cares to hear your opinion about?

Fat, disgusting, contemptuous, vomitous POS.

Go fly on your Gulfstream and tell us again how we peons need to conserve energy, why dontcha.


18 posted on 01/24/2012 9:03:01 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


19 posted on 01/24/2012 9:07:40 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I was wondering what the "crazed sex poodle" was thinking


20 posted on 01/24/2012 9:12:33 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson