You sure take up a lot of space to confuse a very clear message from Christ.
1 Cor 10:16
The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
1 Cor 11:27-29 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
And what of this prior passage on the same subject?
Rather, such ignorance of the obvious immediate and larger context of Scripture and analogous usage (which can be seen here) in order to force the text to fit your pretext is typical of cultic interpretation, but but really is built upon implicit trust in a self proclaimed assuredly infallible magisterium.
And which is the party who really takes up space (just the "Bulls" of the popes from 540 to 1857 are said to fill forty-one volumes), not in careful exegesis as i demonstrated here , but who instead exhibits much presumption and self assertion.