That’s the only thing I believe Pelosi has ever said. It is consistent with the circumstances.
I’m curious, why do you think Gingrich sat on that loveseat with Pelosi in the pro global warming ad? Newt, says it’s “inexplicable”. Do you?
But for fun, let’s stretch credibility beyond its elastic point. Lets pretend it was a momentary judgement lapse. One wonders how many of those he’ll have as President. Heck, the guy didn’t even manage getting on the VA primary ballot. Then he whines to the court that requiring him to observe the same rules (law) other balloted candidates did is unfair. That’s what Marxist demrats do—not conservatives.
Moreover, your Pelosi comment applies equally to Newt. He’s a serial philanderer. His last affair lasted 18 months. That’s 18 months of lying and deception. He’s publicly stated he believes the sham global warming “science”. So which is it? And on and on.
You Gingrichbots love to crow about how smart Newty is. Afterall, he can take any side of any issue. Well that’s cool, but what does he really believe?
And please spare me his previous House voting record. That was then and now is now. The Pelosi claim that she has Newt by the [b****] is a game changer. I leave it to you, RINOs and Marxist demrats to pretend reality is something other than it is.
“The Pelosi claim that she has Newt...is a game changer.”
You think FAR too much of Ms. Pelosi. Are you one of her worshipers?
“I leave it to you, RINOs and Marxist demrats to pretend reality is something other than it is.”
Pure (and honestly, LOONEY) ad hominem directed to me (or those who support Gingrich)...means you have NO substantive reason for such name-calling ...nor for your original post.