Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia: Attack on Tehran is Attack on Moscow
israelnationalnews.com ^ | 1/15/2012 | Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

Posted on 01/15/2012 5:42:06 AM PST by Bobalu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last
To: AD from SpringBay
"Jerusalem is also a muslim holy site."

That is mostly make-believe.

101 posted on 01/15/2012 12:45:33 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Eventually the Regime will fall. When it does there will be a serious purge once again but as for any belief that the next regime, what ever that may be, will be any better is foolish.


102 posted on 01/15/2012 1:04:48 PM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

You have a point, but that’s men not nukes. The original reply was to an assertion that the Russians could wipe us out. They obviously do have some launch capacity, that’s not the issue, its the weapons my FRiend, that are the ones rusting away. They can shoot a thousand missles with nonfunctioning nukes and they could make a bit of a mess, but not WIPE US OUT. On the other hand, even though we have de-commissioned a number of nukes, we still have plenty functional ones if the need arises and sufficient missles to take them to Russia, you can count it.


103 posted on 01/15/2012 1:06:55 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The debt problem could be solved overnight if the bankers would permit our return to non-interest baring currency.


104 posted on 01/15/2012 1:07:03 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Six or eight well placed nukes would destroy the USA, I think the Russians could manage that. Two or three well placed EMP nukes would have a similar effect, I think the Russians could manage that. The Russians do not need to rain nukes down us to destroy us.


105 posted on 01/15/2012 1:15:01 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Bobalu.
106 posted on 01/15/2012 3:25:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

I support the USA only and no exceptions.

Why have American citizens become an expendable commodity by not just the US Govt, and the US Congress, but also by the UN and those that are called neocons?

The USA govt should have their strings pulled only by American citizens. Hopefully no Americans disagree? America first is my only belief because it is my country. If it isn’t yours then you should leave....Mexican or otherwise. .


107 posted on 01/15/2012 5:55:33 PM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

So while all this stuff is flying in from the ruskis, we all must be too busy texting and reading Facebook to notice?

If a frog had wings, he would not bust his butt everytime he jumped.


108 posted on 01/15/2012 6:21:42 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
Not sure of the state of readiness of Russia ICBMs, but one ICBM if MIRVed can deliver 8, 12 perhaps up 16 nukes. Now all 16 will hit the same general location say targets from Boston to D.C. Imagine the damage 6 or 8 ICBMs could do? And then there is always the possibility of several EMP blasts 100 miles or so above the USA. Some say am EMP weapon could destroy just about all electronic circuits for many hundreds of miles under the blast area. A good fiction on an EMP attack is One Second After. Short version is take out the US power grids and the USA is toast. An EMP weapon might just be able to just that as well as frying all other electronics like ignition system in cars, computers, telephones, etc.

Nuclear War with Russia is to be avoided at just about all costs, of course we could do the same to them so they are not interested in war with us either.

109 posted on 01/15/2012 6:40:47 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Related threads

Teheran 'secretly trains' Chechens to fight in Russia (well ruskies build them more nukes)

Russia says no to sanctions against Iran

Russia's Special Relationship With Iran's Mullahs

Russia equips Iran for war

Moscow supports Tehran in nuclear stand-off

110 posted on 07/07/2014 6:59:31 AM PDT by SJackson (government tampers with a freedom so fundamental, one shudders to think what lies ahead. Card Dolan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; Scotsman will be Free
"Time to let the russians know that an attack on Israel is an attack on the U.S. and we will retaliate with all weaponry at our disposal."

"Who?

0bama?...Hillary??
"

Yep, Hillary threw quite a fit while ordering Bill to have U.S. forces bomb the Serbs because of the many reported "rapes." Remember the Russian army's rapes in Berlin and other places. And remember the racism in Russia--much worse than in the U.S.A.

Yeah, they'll do it. Because really, the commanders make the decisions. Who'll be laughing then--the anti-American globetrotters with their concerns about international trade and oil or real Americans concerned more about defense of our nation?

The eyes and ears that would report the need for nuking Russia are all over the world and wearing uniforms. And that, as more nations begin their own nuclear buildups.The longer that bipartisan, anti-defense constituents put it off, the more likely it will be, and the greater and more terrible it will be.


111 posted on 07/08/2014 4:11:40 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
"You can just feel that hook going into the jaw...Welcome to the real battle, vladdie."

Well said. You've studied. There's more.

Gog (a leader of Meshech and Tubal)
The land of Magog (son of Japeth, descendants)
Meshech (son of Japeth, descendants of a tribe)
Tubal (son of Japeth, descendants of a tribe)
Persia (Japeth mainly, some of Ham, descendants)
Cush (son of Ham, descendants)
Put (son of Ham, descendants)
Gomer (descendants)
Togarmah (son of Gomer, son of Japeth, descendants including those in the extreme north)

Many of Iberian descent (probably of Rome/Carthage during the Roman Empire, later, after migrating from an area of Turkey as other tribes did) are descended from some of those figures (southern Europe, spread up through the Balkans, Russia and now the U.S.A over time). And not only of Iberian descent but others also. Finding general movements of descendants is a long and difficult task. They’re all over the world.

The most influential political constituents of many nations are much more concerned for their investments than for defense and morality. That's why political speech and sponsored propaganda everywhere are leaning so much against Israel and the U.S.A.


112 posted on 07/08/2014 4:18:59 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
1. Russian ICBMs are junk. Putin's bragging about what they'll do is similar to the blustering of the mullahs in Iran about their junk. No change there since the Cold War. 2. There are many layers of American anti-ballistic missile defense. 3. The hysteria about EMP attacks is much like that about global warming, and ice age and the saturation of our society with television shows about the end of the world. It exaggerates. Electronics components would be unaffected in most places (limited radii of severely affected areas), and most new supplies would reach their destinations within a couple of months.

4. The amount of damage from enemy nuclear attacks would be irrelevant. But our military forces are positioned to stop many of them on the ground and in the air and would reply at the same time or sooner.


113 posted on 07/08/2014 4:32:05 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson